I experienced the lead up and the
effects of the recession of 2007 – 2009 from a unique standpoint. I am directly
involved in investment banking and many feel that this industry is a big part
of the problems that caused that recession. I think the sentiment has some
validity. However, most of the leaders or men of knowledge in economics and
investment banking never saw it coming. Again, there are some who did see
something and made a lot of money on the fact that they felt something was out
of alignment in the economy. Again, if one looks at much of the literature on
this recession we see individuals drawing conclusions and wondering how we
could have missed it. I was in the thick of the information so to speak and I
didn’t see it coming. Government leaders, economists, most investment bankers
and Wall Street types didn’t see it. We now have Frank-Dodd legislation which
runs into hundreds of thousands of words and is so convoluted that we as a
people will never fully understand what it does nor do the writers of the
legislation really understand its workings or impact. This is supposed to
guarantee that we won’t have another financial situation like this happen
again. Trust me on this one, it will happen again
Let’s look at how we rationalize our
incorrect prediction (or missed predictions). This is how we protect our
self-esteem according to Taleb in his book The
Black Swan, where he suggests four methods of rationalization. (1) Tell
yourself that you were playing a different game. It is not your skills that are
to blame. There is some hidden information or element that if you had known you
would have been right. (2) You invoke the outlier. (This is what is generally
used by the economists and math guys to explain the recession of 2007 – 2009.)
Something happened that was outside the system. Given that it was not
predictable you are not responsible. Hey, it was a 1,000 year flood, of course
I couldn’t predict it. (3) The “almost right” defense. By looking backwards we
assign values after the fact to ideas or events thus applying more or
less importance to things, activities, happenings or events. After the fact we
say this piece of information is important and this is not. (4) The hedgehog
and the fox from Isaiah Berlin and Aesop’s Fables. The hedgehog knows only one
thing and tends to exclude all other thoughts and ideas. It may be a single
consequential but improbable event. This helps make us susceptible to Black
Swans. The fox knows many things and is not married to one idea or course of
action. The fox has an open mind (not empty but open) and tends not to get
married to one idea. The fox knows history will be full of improbable events but
just don’t know what the events will be.
So, be a fox with an open mind.
I was told that when we are looking in the past we have 20/20 vision. That has helped me not say things that would blame people in the past for not seeing things that we can see now.
ReplyDelete