Recession, Banks, Debt Ceiling – You Must Believe Me Now

The question is, if it’s said loud enough will it be believed? Because this time it really is true (it is being said very loudly). Or is it?

The discussion about recession has been on-going for some time now. I started writing about recession possibilities over a year ago. The discussion has moved back and forth between how do we avoid one to how do we get a soft landing to what can we do to help those that will likely suffer if the landing isn’t so soft. We may see in the next several months various pronouncements by various talking heads. You notice I didn’t say anything about what phase this is. I don’t know and it doesn’t matter as much as most news personnel would like you to believe from their  strident and every increasing noise. Remember, it is important to keep the fans whipped up. We will be able to look back in several months when the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) will state that a recession started at such and such a point, or didn’t. Remember, only the Bureau is recognized as the official group that can declare such and they always include factors that are backward looking, meaning we don’t officially know until after the fact. This also means that we don’t officially know if we have had a soft landing, missed recession or face plant until after the fact either. There are other signs that may give us indications of various outcomes, however. We have been moving toward this point for months and months. It is dragging on longer than a normal news cycle so it gets recycled regularly. Expect to see it to continue. Again, the fans need to be whipped up to keep enthusiasm high. We are getting more comments like JPMorgan Chase CEO, Jamie Dimon (CNBC, Apr 14, 2023 Manie Dimon issues warning on rates: ‘It will undress problems in the economy’) that investors and business should plan on interest rates remaining higher for longer. The Fed still needs to “dry out” the economy, get the excess funds (easy money) out of the system. That hasn’t changed. We still have a recession we are trying to work around or work through depending on what you think may happen. Work around implies a soft landing or just a slowdown; The economy slows down, unemployment rises a bit. Banks tighten their lending policies. A few business and individuals suffer or go under. The Fed is able to get their balance sheet down without the stock and bond market tanking (it slows down, drops and recovers fairly quickly). We stumble a bit and slow down. No or mild recession and we carry on at a more measured pace. Work through implies a recession; we trip or worse, face plant and have to pick ourselves back up. We see bank failures, businesses and individuals declare bankruptcy. The Fed isn’t able to maintain a smooth decrease in its balance sheet or worse doesn’t reduce it. The stock and bond market react to all the uncertainty and failures by tanking. It takes a longer to climb out of the hole.

One of the consequences of the higher rates is the financial sector including banks will feel the pinch. They have to change from an easy money mentality to a more measured lending stance. Easy money implies less diligence in protecting deposits and in shoring up a banks balance sheet. There is little or no profit in protecting deposits (lending them out is where money is made) or doing more than the minimum required or skirting regulations. Most banks try to balance the profits with the safety, we have seen the banks that didn’t. The price for skirting the safety regs in good times is minimal and it is hard to see which banks may be skirting until too late when times turn bad. The best we can do is go with financial institutions with a long record of being conservative. Credit Unions tend to be more conservative by their nature and charter requirements. Still, it’s hard to tell. There is something to be said for spreading money around between institutions. We also have deposit insurance which is helpful but in the Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic Bank failures the Fed stepped in and guaranteed all deposits which stressed the insurance provider FDIC (it almost broke it such that another big hit would cause serious problems). So, things are complicated, of course. By guaranteeing all deposit they essentially gave a green light to the poor practices of the bank. They also prevented a bank run on several similar shaky banks across the country. Whether that was the right thing to do or not should be debated for a long time. The current mentality is that the government can fix everything which makes them responsible. Hence more regulation and laws and more places for shady people to find loopholes. Notice that the defense for many of these funny practices is that the entity did nothing wrong, they were following the rules. It was the rules fault. So, of course, more rules are needed. That is a very bad spiral and you can follow it down to the final conclusion. Watch the financial sector for more stress in general and how they seem to take care of it. Look for more rules and regulations. I am glad I am finishing up my career in finance and not starting it. It is a very different and much more difficult place to work then 30-35 years ago when I was first involved.

                Now the debt ceiling question. I am not going to quote any articles. There have been so many. It is the current hot, hot, hot topic button and the news media are mashing it with their biggest and most massive sledge hammers (gleefully I might add). Do you feel like you have been beat up no, pummeled for weeks on end. Everywhere you turn someone or some organization is talking dire straits, doom, gloom, death, destruction, mayhem, the very end of the world as we know it, the end of civilization, the death of all we hold near and dear, (pause for dramatic breath!!!!!!) AURRRGHHHHHHHH. Why can’t you people see how important this is!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry…., I got just a little bit carried away.

It won’t happen again (at least until tomorrow anyway.)

                This is the news and financial media at its finest. This it the current news media model and the debt ceiling is the ultimate opportunity to exercise its model to the fullest. The underlying question is the government has set some limits on its spending capability, a good thing. It has come around again that the government can’t manage its input and output. The easy solution is raise the debt ceiling or remove the debt ceiling requirement or better yet get spending under control. Now, granted, the answer is never that easy and that is also part of the problem. The solution is pretty complex but workable. However, we have powerful political forces that are using this debt ceiling to push their various points and agendas.  

As background information. The following is from Wikepedia, United States debt Ceiling;

The U.S. has never reached the point of default where the Treasury was incapable of paying U.S. debt obligations, though it has been close on several occasions. The only exception was during the War of 1812 when parts of Washington D.C. including the Treasury were burned.

In 2011, the U.S. reached a crisis point of near default on public debt. The delay in raising the debt ceiling resulted in the first downgrade in the United States credit rating, a sharp drop in the stock market, and an increase in borrowing costs. Congress raised the debt limit with the Budget Control Act of 2011, which added to the fiscal cliff when the new ceiling was reached on December 31, 2012.

The last time things got too close, government set new rules and they immediately went about figuring out where the loopholes are. And it is continuing. Is it a problem. Yes. Is it the end of things as we know them (as the news is telling us). No. Are there solutions. Yes. Should you be upset. Yes. Should we be acting like Chicken Little. No. It will play out. It will get close. There will be much rejoicing in the media when the “solution” is reached. Then the media will begin the analysis phase which will allow for continued coverage for many months. So it continues. Should you follow all the stories. DEFINATELY NOT. When this crisis passes the media will need something else to keep us tied to them. Look for the recession to come back in vogue. Don’t be lead around. The various financial crisis will continue in the news. You can always find them if you want. I suggest you don’t want to. Keep your finances simple. Keep debt low. Save as you can. Debt is good for some things, housing, education, transportation. Live simply.

                Remember what is important. It isn’t news. It is family, friends, the things you love. It is the beauties around you. It is relationships, the good earth, the joy of interacting. It is game nights, movies together, playing with kids (big and little ones). It is in quite walks, talking in person to friends and family. Meeting new people, a meal together, building something, watching a sunrise and sunset. Tell someone you love them. Share precious things, a hug a kind word, hope.

The Sword of Damocles - Recession Discussion & Related Thoughts

Sword of Damocles
by Richard Westall

            We start the new year with the sword of Damocles poised over the national and world financial markets. The articles are a smattering of comments, commentary and conjecture from market gurus (both national and world) and federal officials tasked with knowing what is going on. Much of the thinking is still relating to recession but a new term is being introduced into the discussion. Additionally, many are discussing just what and when a recession may or may not occur and Powell (Fed Chairman) is trying to keep the Fed focused on is core responsibility. A typical month in the life of the financial world with many pronouncements, much hand wringing and many loud protestations. So, let’s dive into the murky waters and see just what we can see (or not see).

                A new term is being floated to describe the current financial situation, “slowcession”. Apparently the phrase was coined by Cristian deRitis and used by Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi. It means economic growth “comes to a near standstill but never slips into reverse [recession].” Every economic downturn and upturn for that matter, is a bit different and past historical data can only give limited help in describing any current situation. We won’t know how this recession or as noted above, slowcession, will look until after the fact. It will probably have several differing characteristics from previous recessions but will meet the basic definition of recession. Do we know how this recession will play out, no. Are there some ideas, yes, many. Will any of the ideas be correct. Maybe. Then again they may all be wrong or at least mostly wrong. Then again, with all the possible ideas and conjectures floated over the past 12 months there is likely to be a couple of the ideas that will hit close to what actually happens. Remember, we have had so many possible scenarios described from the death of the markets to no recession that all possible options have at least been considered. Something has to hit, given enough shots taken. So, we don’t really know but we have some ideas on a recession and its impacts.

                The Guardian (London) collected comments from a variety of international economists and financial gurus and gives us a cross-section of thinking. They suggest from their sources that we should “brace for another turbulent year in the financial markets”. (Nothing new there.) Their comments suggest possible improvement and likely fall of markets, particularly the US. The head of the International Monetary Fund suggests that a third of the world’s economies are in recession which is likely “because the three big economies – US, EU and China – are all slowing down simultaneously”. Some are suggesting a global recession this year. Much of the speculation is based on what economists and other believe will be the response by central banks to the high inflation rate, which will be raising governmental monies interest rates. An interesting side comment, the article suggests that Russia’s economy is already in recession caused in large part by Putin’s failure to find an easy way out of the war.

                I have selected 3 articles on recession comments. The Bond Buyer (1/24/23) brings several analysts’ comments together suggesting recession is necessary. Some economists are suggesting a modest recession (Wells Fargo Securities and others) during 2023, others think more than modest. There is now discussion about the impact of the recession on inflation. Remember, recessions are supposed to kill inflation. Some are suggesting inflation will remain above the Fed target of 2.0% and be in the range of 2.5% to 3.5% for at least a decade. The solution to higher than target rates, the Fed can always move its target upward and declare victory in the war on inflation. That wouldn’t surprise me. Finally, there is some discussion that we will have a split year. Good for half and bad for half. Don’t know which half first. BNN Bloomberg (1/5/23) is a discussion by St. Louis Fed Reserve Bank President James Bullard that Fed Funds Rates are getting closer to high enough to bring down inflation. The thought by many from his comment is that the Fed still has some increases to come. The question is will they be .25% or .50% increases. The market views a slowing increase as positive at this point. Several Fed officials are still concerned that inflation is to high or way to high. That points to bigger increases. The 3^rd article from Reuters (1/25/23) is about the impact of all this to investors. The article warns that many “heavyweights [are] warn[ing] of pain ahead despite market’s recent reprieve”. Even though recent market movements have been positive or optimistic, most are warning that recession is still likely. The article states, “correctly gauging the economy is crucial for investors”. The statement is absolutely correct and impossible to do. Remember that. Don’t try. No one can. Ever. Don’t do it. In spite of what many say especially talk radio financial hosts and slick financial advisors. And of course many believe they know more. Some very few will get very lucky and be correct and you will hear about them and their phenomenal good skills (luck is not a skill). The majority (most) will get it wrong and there will never be any report on them or their numbers.

                Stay your course. Don’t panic or as the British war message stated “Keep Calm and Carry On”. Keep your debts manageable / low. Don’t borrow without careful thought. Save and above all….. enjoy life, friends, family and the beauties around us. Be grateful. I am.

Articles used:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/02/global-economic-forecast-for-2023-a-stormy-start-followed-by-a-ray-of-hope

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/03/economy/moodys-us-economy-slowcession/index.html

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/fed-s-bullard-says-rates-are-getting-closer-to-sufficiently-high-1.1866262

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/wall-street-heavyweights-warn-against-goldilocks-hopes-2023-01-25/ 

Hang On For A Rough Ride

                  As the old saying goes, hang on, things are likely to get a bit rough. I have pulled financial news articles from the past week or so. Financial thinking has been fairly consistent for the past weeks and the most recent 10 days have been fairly typical. By consistent I mean, lots of uncertainty, markets and thinking are moving up, down and sideways most all of the time. Nobody really knows much of anything but there is lots of noise.

First, a good article from Think Advisor (10/24/22) concerning the annual meeting of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), an organization I subscribe to and is very much an industry standard. The meeting is attended by many big wigs from finance and government. Janet Yellen, secretary of the Treasury, spoke at the meeting (more on that later). One of the panel discussions included several business economists discussing inflation and recession among other things. Several are now predicting that there will be a recession in 2023. The participants listed several factors supporting their conclusion. The factors are the same as have been discussed before, inflation being the 800 lbs. gorilla in the room. The article gives some good comments and supports for their conclusions. Much of the current discussion involves estimating and second guessing the Fed and its inflation response. Since the 1970s and Alan Greenspan’s solution to inflation the Fed has been terrified of any type of uncontrolled inflation. The solution in the 1970s just about destroyed the US economy before it corrected itself. Corrected itself is also correct, Alan Greenspan and the Fed did not fix the 1970s economy but they made it possible for it (the economy) to rebalance itself – governments and individuals don’t control economies in spite of what they say, economies control governments and people. The Greenspan solution was one that worked or at least that was what governmental and financial think tank gurus came up with that worked, and it did work. Governmental officials and politicians ever since then will do just about anything to avoid that situation again. The problem is that much of the fiscal and governmental policies of the past 20 years have been such that it supports inflationary growth. Then the loose money supply accompanied with artificially low interest rates (yes, dear reader, rates have been artificially low for 20 years, held down by direct intervention from the Fed which allowed government to pursue its various expansionary agendas) got away from the governmental people as it had to do. The low interest rates and expanding money supply couldn’t go on forever but for 20 years governmental types have been kicking that can down the road until now. That is why the current administration is howling that the current inflation isn’t their fault but they are willing to add to the problem by increasing governmental spending by unprecedented amounts which is very inflationary. Hence, trying to kick the can down the road again but the financial system has reached its limit. Goods and services are not able to absorb the excess funds without adjusting and that means prices have to go up, in this case way up, way fast (the basic definition of inflation) as we have seen in the last 8 months. That is why the big concern. This looks a lot like the inflation rates of the 1970s. The cure is of course, recession, the rapid deceleration of spending and the removal of the excess money from the system. It would really help shorten the recession and cause it to be less severe if government curtailed spending, reduced governmental needs and did not fund new programs without also including revenue sources (net funding). All of which the current administration refuses to consider but instead is increasing spending and unfunded programs. We have to wait for price increases to begin to slow or stop (in spite of the governmental spending headwinds) as supply and demand are brought into closer alignment, i.e. demand does not outstrip supply and so prices are normalized and we don’t have too many dollars chasing too few goods. We have to weather inflation as price and supply try to find some sort of new equilibrium. I am afraid inflation hits very unevenly in these situations. It is inherently unfair, unjust and unkind. 

                Again, the mechanism to get inflation under control or rather, under more control is to dry out the excess money from the economy and that is done by making money more difficult or expensive to acquire and use. It has to cost more. The interest rates we pay is the control mechanism. Hence, the Fed Funds Rate helps increase or decrease what it costs to borrow and use money. In the second article by Reuters (10-24-22), Yellen is trying to make the point that the Treasury is aware of the problems of drying out the economy and at least in the area she has some control over is attempting to assure the financial system that the government is willing and able to keep one of the major secondary problems caused by inflation at bay. The problem is that as the cheap money (low borrowing costs, relatively speaking, caused by very low interest rates) dries up, investors become unwilling to speculate and began to draw their funds out of banks and financial institutions and put it in safer places such as Treasury instruments or cash (again safer is relative). Banks and financial institutions use leverage to earn additional profits by using borrowed money to invest. You take your money, they have to go find money somewhere on a short basis to cover your withdrawals. In the great recession of 2008 there wasn’t enough liquid funds available to meet the withdrawal needs and the government bailed out many financial institutions by printing more money among other things and almost wasn’t fast enough in responding (TARP if anyone remembers). Several big financial firms didn’t survive or were absorbed. Yellen is trying to tell the markets she is aware of the situation and it is under control which may or may not be accurate but we can hope.

                The Bloomberg article of 10-21-22 is a discussion of what Fed Funds Rates may be and why or why not. There is some speculation that Fed Funds rates may need to be as high as 4.75% - 5.0%. The Fed is trying to give the impression of controlling inflation and the financial institutions are trying to act like the Fed has some control. Both are incorrect. The Fed can’t “control” inflation and financial institutions are not really supporting the Fed but trying to find any place to hide away from the train wreck that is coming. As an aside, the financial economists are having a heyday because they can predict just about anything and there is a pretty good chance they will be correct at some point, for a change. Watch to see who claims they got the forecast right and what part of the forecast in the next 18 months or so. I need to flog a dead horse again. The Fed can not control inflation with any kind of fine tuning. Watch and see, at the very most they can nudge the inflation rate around. The Fed will get this whole process wrong (as measured by various financial institutions, markets and money gurus). But they may be able to influence inflation to some extent. According to the people in the know (don’t trust the people in the know), the Fed started raising the Fed Funds Rate to late or too early, they will not raise it fast enough or they will raise it too fast, and they will overshoot how high and for how long rates need to stay up and they will either not decrease rates fast enough or too fast on the back side of things. They will not be able to stop the inflation rate from gyrating all over the place, both up and down and they will likely completely miss their target inflation rate of 2.0% by a wide margin. The final solution to the last point will be that the Fed will change the target inflation rate to something other than 2.0%. In two years the Fed will declare that they beat inflation and it is now tame again at whatever rate they decide on. Again, not accurate (notice I didn’t say not true) as the Fed never has really been able to control inflation but rather sets a rate (for the last several years, 2.0%) that somewhat matches the ongoing economic activities. There will be more articles about the Fed and its “fine tuning” the Fed Funds Rate in the coming months. Don’t be fooled by the noise.

                The final article is a bit of fluff about the resignation of Prime Minster Liz Truss (Britain) after just 44 days in office. She has the distinction of being the shortest serving prime minster in history. Many of her problems were caused by very aggressive economic policies that were considered too radical for the times. Just a reminder why governments tend to be slow and ponderous in their decisions and a good example of why we have had 20+ years of expansion in this country. It is too politically difficult to change things and who wants to rock the boat, even if it needs it until there is some kind of popular uprising that is consistent with the political leaders thinking. A good example is the case of Ronald Regan and the then new thinking of supply side economics which was a good thing.

 

Articles referenced;

https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2022/10/24/bofa-economist-i-dont-see-how-we-avoid-a-recession/

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/yellen-says-taking-steps-enhance-treasury-market-funds-resilience-2022-10-24/

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-21/fed-officials-expect-debate-on-rate-peak-and-when-to-slow-hikes

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/markets-are-calling-the-shots-uk-traders-react-to-truss-exit-1.1835289

Kitten on a Mission - How Things Change

 Notice how a kitten will jump on anything and everything and is easily distracted. This applies to governmental officials, financial professionals and financial news organizations.

The National Bureau of Economic Research is a private organization responsible for calling the official timing of a recession. It states a recession “is a marked declined across the economy in a range of indicators, including the labor market, investment and spending.” Usually people tend to look for 2 quarters of downturn in several indicators including GDP growth (negative), employment (negative), consumption and spending and other financial measures such as an inverted yield curve. Many of these measures can be analyzed by month, which is 5 months shorter than the classical 2 quarter+ measurement of the official bureau. That is why we get the range of dates or even no date on recession estimations. The only one officially recognized to call a recession tends to use at least 2 quarters of historical data before they make a pronouncement.

                With that in mind let’s turn to some news stories. From June 6^th, BNN Bloomberg (Canada), the headline reads “Powell says soft landing ‘very challenging,’ recession possible.” The article suggests that “Powell has given his most explicit acknowledgment to date that steep rates could tip the US economy into recession, saying one is possible and calling a soft landing ‘very challenging” ‘. Notice that the language is still couched and nuanced and leaves much room to wiggle. He still leaves a way for the Fed to claim that they are not forecasting a recession, yet. In spite of the hikes in the Fed Funds Rate and the reduction of the Fed balance sheet. The article discusses Powell’s reactions and actions to inflation reports. Republican have recently been blasting Powell for not jumping on inflation sooner by raising rates faster. Again we have the current bandwagon of thought. Watch as comments shifts back and forth. Powell didn’t do enough, Powell did too much. Remember, the Fed has a sledge hammer to deliver adjustments and the talking heads including Congress are reacting as if there is a precise tool. There isn’t and they (Fed) can’t use it that way (with precision). The Fed has fostered this thinking which is bringing the problem back to roost (as the saying goes) by their own past statements and actions. They act as if they can precisely control inflation and growth. They can’t. So when they get called out for not being able to steer the economy they have in large measure brought it on themselves by implying they can control. Again, they can’t. Expect to see more and harsher statements especially from Congress and talking heads.

                Moving to the 2^nd article, from Politico of 7/04/2022. Tag line is “President Joe Biden says ‘there’s nothing inevitable’ about a recession in the U.S. Right…., and where is the rest of the statement the country asks? Many are saying the president is a lone voice in the noise of recession and he probably is at this point. This is pure politics. Since the president can’t (or shouldn’t) try to influence the Fed which is supposed to be independent by definition, the president can make calming public statements and call Powell privately in desperation. Several Democrats are on record as suggesting this recession thing is not a big problem, we just need to spend more.

                The 3^rd article is from BNN Bloomberg of 7/07/2022. The tag line reads, “US recession is already here, according to Wells Fargo Investment Group”. Think back to our previous blog on economic / financial forecasts and notice that here we have the first news grabbers with a new story or new twist and trying to get out front of the news competition. We can see the progression of news stories as we went from no recession to possible recession to more likely recession to predicting recession in the future (from middle to end of 2023) to now we are in a recession. Pure news grabbing. Watch to see of others will jump on this bandwagon or if they suggest something else. Regardless they (the newsies) have a new and exciting twist to write about which generates copy (not necessarily good copy but copy).

                What to do. Slow and steady wins the race or in this situation slow and thoughtful keeps their sanity. You know the news articles and newsies are going to jump on everything just like our kitten does. Their attention is divided so many different direction (very much on purpose) because it generates pages to read. Again, there are few if any consequences in reporting so you have to be selective in what you read. Watch for things to settle out a bit and see. A good example is the recession. Since the first of the year the talking heads started as recession was not likely but a possibility to now a recession is likely and may be as early as next year. I don’t give much weight to the Wells Fargo comments about the recession has started because it is the first mention (a kitten pounced on something let’s all look). That makes it a new idea and someone was trying to get the jump on everyone else. If they are wrong it doesn’t matter to them. It’s news. Remember, slow and thoughtful helps you keep your financial sanity. You don’t have to react to every new thing. Paraphrasing what President Brigham Young was supposed to have said to the woman who came in for counseling, “Well sister, if your husband tells you to go to hell, well just don’t go.” If the newsies, financial pundits and governmental officials tell you we have to jump, well, just don’t jump (wait and see). Regardless of their screaming we will figure it out. Earplugs help. Enjoy family, friends and your favorite sport or book, take a walk, do something fun and relaxing. The screaming, finger pointing and loud noises will still be there when we get back and maybe, just maybe, there might be some calmer voices with some real, helpful information. We can always hope.

 

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/powell-says-soft-landing-very-challenging-recession-possible-1.1782346

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/04/recession-talk-surges-in-washington-00043818

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/us-recession-is-already-here-according-to-wells-fargo-investment-group-1.1789170

 

The Art of the Economic / Financial Forecast

 

 

        Have you watched a child finger paint recently. Some start slowly then add more colors or big swirls. Then at some point mix the colors all together and want to start over. That is a good analogy for today’s markets and the forecasts that are being generated by various parties. What can you make from the mess? There are some nuggets in the mess but they may be more related to the process than the actual information provided. Economic / financial forecasting has a sequence to it. As a new problem is perceived the individual members of the reporting community try to grab the initiative on the other community members by reporting something fastest and loudest. There usually isn’t much substance and very little analysis to the first reports / analysis, mainly noise to generate interest. Quick charts and graphs will be added to give substance but may not be of much value. As the issue develops more concrete information is included as it becomes known, statements from officials, past trends that are thought to be similar to the current unfolding situation. Remember, the new problem has not really developed yet so any comparisons to past data are wild and loose. But there will be charts and graphs and comparisons. As the situation develops, conjectures, suppositions, ideas, comparisons and theories will be put forth and discarded at a rapid rate. There should be lots of conflicting opinions and conflicting charts and graphs. As the situation further develops the initial flurry should settle down a bit with more concrete information based on actual current data. Opinions on the meaning of the data will still swing wildly and there will be many interpretations and many conflicting points, still. At some point the data will tend to support a particular analysis. All the other conflicting statements will be forgotten or just dropped and there will be some general pronouncement from some official, governmental or business leader that many if not most will agree with. There will be a short period of quiet or something like a breather then some news group will perceive a new problem and away they all go again with the reporting community trying to grab the initiative. Several new problems may be simultaneously running depending on the particular economic climate. Our current climate is very conducive to the multiple current problem scenarios. The news groups love this type of environment. There are so many possible new problems that many groups have the opportunity to be first on something. This is the time for them to be looking and jumping on and at any and every new piece of information and rumor.

                So, what are you to do. Take it slow and easy on the new news. Wait for a theory or idea to stand some test of time. As an example, I quote from a CNN Politics article of June 1^st ,Treasury secretary concedes she was wrong on ‘path that inflation would take’ and which were also referred to in a Reuters article of June 7^th, Yellen says inflation to stay high, Biden likely to up forecast,

“US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen admitted Tuesday that she had failed to anticipate how long high inflation would continue to plague American consumers as the Biden administration works to contain a mounting political liability.

"I think I was wrong then about the path that inflation would take," Yellen told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on "The Situation Room" when asked about her comments from 2021 that inflation posed only a "small risk."

The admission was the latest indication that the administration's expectations of a normalizing economy were thrown into disarray by the continuing pandemic and the war in Europe.

"As I mentioned, there have been unanticipated and large shocks to the economy that have boosted energy and food prices and supply bottlenecks that have affected our economy badly that I didn't -- at the time -- didn't fully understand, but we recognize that now," she said.

Yellen and other White House officials once framed inflation as a temporary side effect of the economy returning to normal following the pandemic, pointing to snags in supply chains and demand outstripping supply.”

Yellen has taken more responsibility than is usually done for her comments. The market did call her out on it however. Notice the time frame is 6-8 months,  much too long to wait in the news hungry environment that requires snap statements and quick facts and figures.

                What then are some of the new, new problems that the news folks are jumping on. Stagflation is now starting to show up in articles, recession is much more common and is expected to occur in 2023. The discussion is now when in 2023 for recession, some are saying 2^nd quarter, others late in the year. The shouting has gone from no recession or few saying it was possible, including the governmental officials, to many saying recession is possible even likely. Notice there hasn’t been as much said (or at least not said by the mainstream newsies) about supply chain bottlenecks or the Ukrainian war. Employment figures have become sparce in the last little while. The stock and bond market movements are getting some attention on a periodic basis, mainly when a new high or low is hit. Notice I didn’t specify just how high or low or how relevant it might be. Movement is what seems to be interesting the newsies. Again it comes back to volatility and uncertainty. With uncertainty newsies can make wild statements and maybe they get it right. If they don’t there is very little consequence to being wrong. Remember that, no or very minor consequences for being wrong. Look at Yellen and Powell. No job loss, little or no censure but it is important to have an excuse, the greatest one is “unforeseen circumstances”. In that context everything can be considered unforeseen.

                Good luck and hang in there. Take everything with a grain of salt until some time has passed. Remember the definition of recession requires a look back meaning that we have to have historical data meeting certain criteria before a recession can be declared. It is past tense. We won’t know when a recession has started until after the fact. Many financial situations are like that. It’s not worth getting worked up and panicky about. Enjoy life, family, friends and the beauties around us.  

CNN Article

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/31/politics/treasury-secretary-janet-yellen-inflation-cnntv/index.html

Reuters Article

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-faces-unacceptable-levels-inflation-yellen-tells-senators-2022-06-07/