The Year of More of the Same

  

        I have two pieces of information before me on my desk. One is from Winters & Co. Advisors, LLC, an investment agent who I have worked with over the years. The Winters document contains a chart showing the swap yield curve for the last 4 years based on today’s date (swap rates tend to closely follow same maturity treasuries). The most recent 2 years shows an inverted yield curve in the 4% to 6% range. The curves for 2020 and 2021 show normal sloping curves in the range of 0% to 1.95%. The second document is a short story from the Wall Street Journal of today with the headline, “As inflation cools, economists see soft landing for US”. What a ride we have had for the last two plus years. We have been riding the Fed induced rollercoaster since mid-2021 when inflation started its climb from the benchmark of 2% (4.2% - Apr 2021) to its high of 9.1% in June of 2022. It slowly trended downward through the balance of 2022 and finally was back down to 3% in June of this year. The rate trended up to 3.7% through September and is 3.2% for October according to US inflation Calculator (usinflationcalculatior.com/inflation/current-inflation-rates/). Remember, the Fed moved the goal posts last year when it said that they would be happy if long term inflation would stay in the 3.0% range as opposed to its 30 year target range of 2.0%. The Wall Street article states “Economists continue to see the US economy approaching a soft landing as inflation data comes in better than expected, with little signs of impending recession. This would mark the first time in 80 years the Federal Reserve has brought down inflation without triggering a recession.” Not bad if it does happen, i.e. no recession triggered. However, the Fed doesn’t have a very good track record and they did move the goal posts to make it easier to claim success. So, change the rules, take 2 ½ years to do something that many times (one can’t say normally in economic situations) takes 6 to 8 months and declare victory at the new levels, maybe. I see that the Wall Street group is the first on the soft landing band wagon in this current time period. Do you remember the movie Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines (1965 comedy). It goes on to say something like, they go uppity up up, they go downdity down down. I am afraid we have been doing the up down routine along the bottom of the economic landscape for the last 2 ½ years.

      No, we haven’t had an official recession yet but we haven’t had much growth in the economy either. We have a very high Federal Fund rate that looks to stay high for some time to come according to Chairman Powell. In the Associated Press article of November 1, 2023, “Federal Reserve leaves its key rate unchanged but keeps open possibility of a future hike” I quote;

The central bank’s latest statement noted that the economy “expanded at a strong pace” in the July-September quarter and that job gains “remain strong.” And it reiterated that future rate hikes, if the Fed finds them necessary, remain under consideration.

But it also acknowledged that recent tumult in the financial markets has sent interest rates on 10-year Treasury notes to near 16-year highs and contributed to higher loan rates across the economy — a trend that helps serve the Fed’s goal of cooling the economy and inflation pressures.

Powell himself suggested that Fed officials remain unsure about whether further rate increases might still be needed to defeat inflation. That stance marks a shift from earlier this year, when the policymakers had made clear that they leaned toward pushing rates higher.

I am curious to see if the Fed will consider inflation beaten at a 2% rate or the newer Fed suggested 3% rate. It sounds like the Fed is watching and ready to hike the Fed Funds rate more if necessary. Not a strong sign of reduced volatility as the higher rate tends to make other aspects of the economy volatile and unpredictable. The good news is the Fed hasn’t forgotten about the huge balance sheet problem which is and was one of the primary driving forces for the inflation explosion in the first place. Remember the huge balance sheet was fueled by artificially low borrowing rates for so very, very long. In a Reuters article of October 31, 2023 I again quote;

The eventual end of the Federal Reserve’s efforts to reduce its vast bond holdings increasingly appears tied to what happens with the central bank's "reverse repo" operations.

The program, launched nearly a decade ago, grew rapidly starting in the spring of 2021 and by June 2022 was consistently taking in more than $2 trillion a day in what was seen as clear evidence of the amount of excess cash sloshing around the financial system. Inflows have dropped sharply in recent months to around $1 trillion in the face of the Fed's aggressive policy tightening underway since last year.

Lou Crandall, chief economist with Wrightson ICAP, a research firm …  reckons the Fed still has time in this process, and speaking earlier this month, Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester agreed.

"We still have a very large balance sheet" so the balance sheet cuts can likely continue over the next year and half to two years, she said, adding when it comes to getting to the finish line, "it's going to take a while."

    So, what might we see regarding inflation, economic growth, and a return to normal (whatever normal may be 😊)? Well, that’s just it. I suspect more of the same which is a fair amount of uncertainty and ambiguity plus a large dose of prevarication by the various economic gurus, and financial and governmental leaders. I am afraid we aren’t going to know until we know. Or at the very earliest after the fact (yup, after the fact). Not much comfort. However what you can do is stay conservative in your investments. Don’t concentrate your holdings but spread things out. Don’t go for financial or investing fads. Save as you can, spend less, and find ways to enjoy things more like family, friends, the beauties around us. Don’t worry to much about the economy. It has survived several other difficult times regardless of what people, institutions and governments do to it. Things will of course certainly, almost without fail, very likely, probably, in most cases solve themselves, we think. (But don’t quote us on that.)

Articles cited.

Federal Reserve leaves its key rate unchanged but keeps open possibility of a future hike

https://apnews.com/article/inflation-interest-rates-prices-economy-federal-reserve-63f5a7ed041d6b55c7aa773d071a05fb

Fed’s reverse repo facility drawdown looms large in balance sheet debate

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/feds-reverse-repo-facility-drawdown-looms-large-balance-sheet-debate-2023-10-31/

Bank Failure, Recession – What Is Happening

 

        I am composing this blog while listening to 5 songs, playing loudly, Living the Dream by Foreigner, Demolition Man by Sting, Bang a Drum by Jon Bon Jovie, Wheel in the Sky by Journey, and Dr. Heckyll & Mr. Jive by Men at Work. Mainly because they sound good loud, better louder, especially with more bass. The lyrics are a good mix of some of my feelings regarding the economy, economic policy and the people playing the various roles in this current economic play (especially Bang a Drum).

                I haven’t said anything for a few weeks as I was waiting for the news noise to settle down and we can pick through the points in a more reasoned manner.  The Associated Press article titled Fed raises key rate by quarter-point despite bank turmoil by Christopher Rugaber (3/22/23) is a good summary of the past several weeks and may hold some insight into future activities. I have put a link to the article at the end of this post.

                First, bank failures. The problem is 3-fold. One, with the Fed raising the Fed Funds rates and attempting to dry out the economy by removing money from the economy, all borrowing costs have increased as well as interest rates on all new debt instruments. Treasury rates have changed wildly and are higher across the board. Don’t worry about short term vs. long term differences, just know all rates are up, up a lot. The purpose is to remove money from the overall economy so that too much money is not chasing too few goods (one of the basic definitions of inflation). The higher rates affect you in many ways but especially if you have old bonds (bonds at old, lower rates) and you need to get the principal before the bonds naturally mature. Remember, interest rates and principal value are inversely related. If rates go up principal value goes down. However, this only happens if the bonds are sold before their maturity date. If the bonds don’t need to be sold early then no foul, no harm. When they talk about bonds losing or gaining value it only relates to having to sell them before maturity. It’s only a paper change based on current conditions. It is a way of looking at current opportunities vs. what was spent / invested previously. If you have an existing, older mortgage you are saying, boy what I deal I got. If you are looking at invested funds you are saying I wish I had my money free right now because I could earn a lot more if I invested now. You don’t owe any more interest on your mortgage or have fewer dollars coming in from your invested bonds. Now, if you need to borrow new money or invest some current excess funds then the current rates will apply. That is where you will see the impact of higher rates, on any new debt you want to acquire or new investments which will give you more earnings. If, however, you need to get the money out of your current investments you will have a problem which is what all the current news is talking about as lost money. Remember, there is an inverse relationship between rates and principal, as rates increase, principal decreases and vise-versa. In order for you to get your money back early (i.e., sell your current debt/bond) someone else will have to buy it and they are not going to want your old interest rate bond because it has a lower interest earnings rate than what that person can get if they were to take their money into the market today and buy a new debt instrument. In order to make it attractive to the new investor you need to make your old debt equal to the current debt they can get. Debt is equal to the value of the stream of remaining interest payments plus the principal payment. So if the interest payments are lower than current interest payments you have to take less principal to make up the difference (not quite that simple because compounding is also included). So, if current interest rates are higher and you have to sell your old debt then you will get less than the stated principal to make up the difference. If you were counting on that total principal amount you now have less.

                That leads to the second part of the bank failure problem. Banks make money by lending out their deposits and funds to borrowers (no problem). Banks learned a long time ago that they can’t lend all their deposit as they need some funds to cover regular transactions. If people can’t get their money in a timely fashion they won’t invest in the bank. The Fed has set various rules for how much banks must maintain in cash and cash equivalents to meet short term demand. (A discussion for another time is why does the Fed have to set the rules thus removing the need for banks to be their own monitors. That is why we have too big to fail banks and other problems, banks aren’t responsible for their poor decisions because the Fed picks up the responsibility, and cost.) One of the cash equivalents allowed by the Fed is the bank can hold Treasury bonds and high quality municipal debt (bonds). The bank should always be monitoring the impact of changing rates and if rates are moving then what is the value of the principal if the debt has to be sold immediately (can’t wait for maturity). Usually the bank will “hedge” the debt meaning they have various financial products that will allow them to cover the loss in having to sell before maturity. These instruments are not perfect and can have problems themselves.

                The third part of the bank failure. Silicon Valley  and Signature Bank had depositors that included venture capitalists and other very sophisticated investors. The investors realized that the bank was either not hedging their funds properly or had lent out too much in relation to what they needed to cover their short term needs. The investors fairly quietly started taking their deposits back. Problem is many watch venture capitalists very closely. It took only a few days for a run to start on the bank meaning not just a few but lots of people want their money back, now. The bank had to sell their cash equivalent funds (because they didn’t have enough cash) which were in treasury bonds, considered very safe (and they are because the federal government will always pay what they owe) but they had to sell in a rising interest rate market. Investors won’t pay the full principal amount because interest rates are higher than the rates on the bonds. Hence, less principal coming back. The bank sold something like $21 billion in securities and lost $1.8 billion. They needed to make up the difference and tried to sell new stock to raise it. That sent more shockwaves through bank customers which led to a run on the bank. No one wanted to buy the stock. The bank was overwhelmed by withdrawals and couldn’t meet the demand. The Fed stepped in and closed the bank.

                Many are suggesting that the Fed’s interest rate policy led to the bank failures. High interest rates certainly caused the problem of the lost principal when the bank was forced to sell before maturity. The bank was supposed to be monitoring such things. According to reports, the bank’s mix of securities and cash was substantially different (worse) from industry averages.

The Fed this week increased the Fed Funds Rate by only 25 basis points, recently it was expected to be 50 basis points. There is news noise that the Fed should stop, increase, change. There are calls for Congress to do something (more regulation), again news noise. There may well be new regulations but let it sit a bit before you start looking / commenting. Previous Federal policies and regulations made much of this mess, they may or may not be able to do some good. I am not particularly hopeful but one never knows. There is much noise around the Treasury and Federal Reserve’s move that guaranteed all deposits not just those of $250,000 or less (FDIC insured) at the failed banks. That move was to keep the bank runs from spreading to other banks. It seems to have worked at this point but things are still dicey in the banking sector. Questions are being asked about what other banks may have similar situations to SVB and Signature bank. There have been rumblings in other parts of the country. We have had many public officials making official public announcements. Remember news noise, we don’t know yet in spite of all the words. Back to the guaranteeing of all deposits. That releases all responsibility of the banks and the big depositors. The system wasn’t designed to cover those types of costs. Biden and Yellen have promised that taxpayers won’t cover this cost. There isn’t enough money in the FDIC funds to cover the cost of insuring those uninsured deposits. The insurance premiums are collected from bank fees to all banks. You and I pay those fees. I don’t see how we aren’t going to pay the costs. Unless public officials come up with some other plan, we can hope they will. Now we have another precedence set for banks to rely on the Federal government to bail them out, tying them closer still to the government.

                A recession is still very much on the table. The Fed needs to balance the problems caused by tighter policy (higher rates) with the expected problems generated by those policies, yes expected (the problems aren’t new). They also include stalled growth (which is needed but how long might it last), increasing unemployment, higher borrowing costs. Markets really, really hate, loth, fear, you name it, all this uncertainty. They don’t like it and tend to rebel (do things that the Fed isn’t expecting or prepared for – like bank failures). Expect to see this continue. It’s all part of the process. Remember, we have survived this sort of thing before (recession). It is NOT the end of the world as we know it. It is NOT going to go on forever. The sky is NOT falling. (Things you will hear in the news noise.) It is part of the process of getting the economy back on track and working better. It is going to work, it has worked before and it will work again. Hang in there. Remember what is important and that important things are NOT found in news noise. They are found in friends, family, loved ones and enjoying life. It is doing things together and learning new things. It is in seeing all the beauty around us and enjoying that. It is found in loving and caring more.

            I am now stepping off my soapbox and turning down the music volume.

AP news article -

https://apnews.com/article/federal-reserve-inflation-banks-interest-rates-jobs-91a9185ebce972bbf5ab1f46654f1a53

Hang On For A Rough Ride

                  As the old saying goes, hang on, things are likely to get a bit rough. I have pulled financial news articles from the past week or so. Financial thinking has been fairly consistent for the past weeks and the most recent 10 days have been fairly typical. By consistent I mean, lots of uncertainty, markets and thinking are moving up, down and sideways most all of the time. Nobody really knows much of anything but there is lots of noise.

First, a good article from Think Advisor (10/24/22) concerning the annual meeting of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), an organization I subscribe to and is very much an industry standard. The meeting is attended by many big wigs from finance and government. Janet Yellen, secretary of the Treasury, spoke at the meeting (more on that later). One of the panel discussions included several business economists discussing inflation and recession among other things. Several are now predicting that there will be a recession in 2023. The participants listed several factors supporting their conclusion. The factors are the same as have been discussed before, inflation being the 800 lbs. gorilla in the room. The article gives some good comments and supports for their conclusions. Much of the current discussion involves estimating and second guessing the Fed and its inflation response. Since the 1970s and Alan Greenspan’s solution to inflation the Fed has been terrified of any type of uncontrolled inflation. The solution in the 1970s just about destroyed the US economy before it corrected itself. Corrected itself is also correct, Alan Greenspan and the Fed did not fix the 1970s economy but they made it possible for it (the economy) to rebalance itself – governments and individuals don’t control economies in spite of what they say, economies control governments and people. The Greenspan solution was one that worked or at least that was what governmental and financial think tank gurus came up with that worked, and it did work. Governmental officials and politicians ever since then will do just about anything to avoid that situation again. The problem is that much of the fiscal and governmental policies of the past 20 years have been such that it supports inflationary growth. Then the loose money supply accompanied with artificially low interest rates (yes, dear reader, rates have been artificially low for 20 years, held down by direct intervention from the Fed which allowed government to pursue its various expansionary agendas) got away from the governmental people as it had to do. The low interest rates and expanding money supply couldn’t go on forever but for 20 years governmental types have been kicking that can down the road until now. That is why the current administration is howling that the current inflation isn’t their fault but they are willing to add to the problem by increasing governmental spending by unprecedented amounts which is very inflationary. Hence, trying to kick the can down the road again but the financial system has reached its limit. Goods and services are not able to absorb the excess funds without adjusting and that means prices have to go up, in this case way up, way fast (the basic definition of inflation) as we have seen in the last 8 months. That is why the big concern. This looks a lot like the inflation rates of the 1970s. The cure is of course, recession, the rapid deceleration of spending and the removal of the excess money from the system. It would really help shorten the recession and cause it to be less severe if government curtailed spending, reduced governmental needs and did not fund new programs without also including revenue sources (net funding). All of which the current administration refuses to consider but instead is increasing spending and unfunded programs. We have to wait for price increases to begin to slow or stop (in spite of the governmental spending headwinds) as supply and demand are brought into closer alignment, i.e. demand does not outstrip supply and so prices are normalized and we don’t have too many dollars chasing too few goods. We have to weather inflation as price and supply try to find some sort of new equilibrium. I am afraid inflation hits very unevenly in these situations. It is inherently unfair, unjust and unkind. 

                Again, the mechanism to get inflation under control or rather, under more control is to dry out the excess money from the economy and that is done by making money more difficult or expensive to acquire and use. It has to cost more. The interest rates we pay is the control mechanism. Hence, the Fed Funds Rate helps increase or decrease what it costs to borrow and use money. In the second article by Reuters (10-24-22), Yellen is trying to make the point that the Treasury is aware of the problems of drying out the economy and at least in the area she has some control over is attempting to assure the financial system that the government is willing and able to keep one of the major secondary problems caused by inflation at bay. The problem is that as the cheap money (low borrowing costs, relatively speaking, caused by very low interest rates) dries up, investors become unwilling to speculate and began to draw their funds out of banks and financial institutions and put it in safer places such as Treasury instruments or cash (again safer is relative). Banks and financial institutions use leverage to earn additional profits by using borrowed money to invest. You take your money, they have to go find money somewhere on a short basis to cover your withdrawals. In the great recession of 2008 there wasn’t enough liquid funds available to meet the withdrawal needs and the government bailed out many financial institutions by printing more money among other things and almost wasn’t fast enough in responding (TARP if anyone remembers). Several big financial firms didn’t survive or were absorbed. Yellen is trying to tell the markets she is aware of the situation and it is under control which may or may not be accurate but we can hope.

                The Bloomberg article of 10-21-22 is a discussion of what Fed Funds Rates may be and why or why not. There is some speculation that Fed Funds rates may need to be as high as 4.75% - 5.0%. The Fed is trying to give the impression of controlling inflation and the financial institutions are trying to act like the Fed has some control. Both are incorrect. The Fed can’t “control” inflation and financial institutions are not really supporting the Fed but trying to find any place to hide away from the train wreck that is coming. As an aside, the financial economists are having a heyday because they can predict just about anything and there is a pretty good chance they will be correct at some point, for a change. Watch to see who claims they got the forecast right and what part of the forecast in the next 18 months or so. I need to flog a dead horse again. The Fed can not control inflation with any kind of fine tuning. Watch and see, at the very most they can nudge the inflation rate around. The Fed will get this whole process wrong (as measured by various financial institutions, markets and money gurus). But they may be able to influence inflation to some extent. According to the people in the know (don’t trust the people in the know), the Fed started raising the Fed Funds Rate to late or too early, they will not raise it fast enough or they will raise it too fast, and they will overshoot how high and for how long rates need to stay up and they will either not decrease rates fast enough or too fast on the back side of things. They will not be able to stop the inflation rate from gyrating all over the place, both up and down and they will likely completely miss their target inflation rate of 2.0% by a wide margin. The final solution to the last point will be that the Fed will change the target inflation rate to something other than 2.0%. In two years the Fed will declare that they beat inflation and it is now tame again at whatever rate they decide on. Again, not accurate (notice I didn’t say not true) as the Fed never has really been able to control inflation but rather sets a rate (for the last several years, 2.0%) that somewhat matches the ongoing economic activities. There will be more articles about the Fed and its “fine tuning” the Fed Funds Rate in the coming months. Don’t be fooled by the noise.

                The final article is a bit of fluff about the resignation of Prime Minster Liz Truss (Britain) after just 44 days in office. She has the distinction of being the shortest serving prime minster in history. Many of her problems were caused by very aggressive economic policies that were considered too radical for the times. Just a reminder why governments tend to be slow and ponderous in their decisions and a good example of why we have had 20+ years of expansion in this country. It is too politically difficult to change things and who wants to rock the boat, even if it needs it until there is some kind of popular uprising that is consistent with the political leaders thinking. A good example is the case of Ronald Regan and the then new thinking of supply side economics which was a good thing.

 

Articles referenced;

https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2022/10/24/bofa-economist-i-dont-see-how-we-avoid-a-recession/

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/yellen-says-taking-steps-enhance-treasury-market-funds-resilience-2022-10-24/

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-21/fed-officials-expect-debate-on-rate-peak-and-when-to-slow-hikes

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/markets-are-calling-the-shots-uk-traders-react-to-truss-exit-1.1835289

The Whirlwind of Financial News

 

    “Round and Round she goes, where she stops nobody knows.” The phrase was used by the Major Bowes Original Amateur Hour, a radio show that ran from 1934-1948. However, I think it also describes our current economic and financial situation to a tee. I present to you 3 themes from this week’s news feeds that are “round and round” or in my mind, or more of the same. The news themes are; (a) vanishing liquidity and its impacts, (b) impacts of slowing economy, specifically in this article as it relates to investors, and (c) Dow Jones is down… again. However, since it isn’t zero that means there had to have been some ups somewhere.

            Bloomberg is reporting in its article of 9/12/22, titled Vanishing Bond Market Liquidity Bad for Fed Balance Sheet Unwind, that the Fed program to reduce its balance sheet may be headed for the rocks. The article discusses the tightening liquidity in the short term money market and how that may make it more difficult for the Fed to reduce its balance sheet. The article is fairly esoteric but the bottom line is the possible recession is making the drawdown of the Fed balance sheet more difficult and uncertain. The high balance sheet makes it more difficult for actions the Fed takes to have as much impact as it may, i.e. there is little or no room to flex monetary  policy to change the impact or likelihood of recession. With Pres. Biden’s  Inflation Reduction Act which really doesn’t reduce inflation pressures as much as it adds to the balance sheet you can see that the Fed is being painted into a corner. The current Fed policy of increasing Fed Funds Rate to try to tighten spending (reduce it) is being offset by the Inflation Reduction Act which is expanding monetary policy. The Fed’s only possible response is to raise its Funds Rate high enough to put a damper on inflation caused by excess money in the system, which the president just increased by a tremendous amount. This does not bode well for an economic “soft landing” as proposed and suggested by the Fed and pushed by Administration personnel, i.e. the Treasury Secretary, and of course the president, amount others.

            In the second article UBS Bank suggests its clients are becoming more cautious in their money management and involvement. The Reuters article titled, USB CFO sees increased client caution as global economy slows discusses the decreased activity by bank clients in the world financial systems. This would mainly be the large bank clients involved in the world markets. The article discusses how this is putting downward pressure on bank revenues as their revenue tends to be based on transactions, fewer transactions generates less revenue. The important part of the article is that the financial markets impact is worldwide. The bank is attempting to assure bank investors they (the bank) recognize the problem and as with all situations like this, they are not responsible for declining revenue as no one could have foreseen this. This seems like some attempted fancy footwork to distance management from what it sees as a likely downturn in revenue. The bank is betting on economic slowdown at best and, I suspect, recession at worst. They are declaring they are not responsible.

            Finally CNBC is reporting another stock market down record in its 9/13/22 headline, Dow tumbles 1,200 points for worst day since June 2020 after hot inflation report. This is a good article to show the up and down and down and up nature of markets in troubled (meaning uncertain) economic times and the reporting by news organizations on such things. Notice two things about the headline, one, the Dow is moving 1,200 points, in this instance down. That is about 3.9% as reported in the article. The second thing is this is the largest change in 2 years. The first statement implies that 1,200 is a big deal the second statement suggests that it isn’t that uncommon, only 2 years since the last time we had such a shift. Somewhat contradictory statements. The article states the drop erased “nearly all of the recent rally for stocks”. You will not easily find articles on stocks increasing 1,200 points recently but you will and do find many articles on stock decreases.  Part of the reason for not finding articles on increases is they tend to be a bit more gradual. I do believe there have been some recent trading days that were up a lot though they are a bit more difficult to find. It’s important to weigh any major swing reported in the news in light of just how significant it is. One of the definitions of economic upheaval is wild and vicious swings. You should look at this as a general reporting news story. Try to separate the facts and figures from the color commentary.

            In conclusion, stuff happens. Markets, interest rates and prices go up and down, many times violently in an economic upheaval (think pre-recession – recession). If all the negative news of the last little while were added up the Dow Jones Industrial Average would be at zero or below. It is down, admittedly, but not zero and actually closer to its high or sitting at about 31,000. It may fall 10-15% total from the recent high to whatever its low point will be before it recovers. We won’t know until after the fact what the total fall may have been, or when the recession started or when we have officially recovered. We had our annual meeting with our financial advisor a couple of weeks ago. Parts of our portfolio are definitely down from last year but they had been up a great deal previously. Other parts are holding fairly steady and some parts are actually benefiting from the increasing interest rates. So, balance in life and investments is helpful. Hang in there we will make it through this. Live, love, and enjoy life. There is much to be grateful for and thankful for.

Bloomberg article:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-12/vanishing-bond-market-liquidity-bad-for-fed-balance-sheet-unwind

REUTERS article:

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/ubs-cfo-sees-potential-higher-dividend-next-year-2022-09-13/

CNBC article:

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/12/stock-futures-are-higher-as-wall-street-awaits-key-inflation-report-.html

The Fed and Beating Up Inflation

 “The beatings will continue until morale improves.” The author is uncertain but  it is the correct statement for the current economic situation. The beatings are, of course, increases in Fed Funds rate and morale is an improving inflation rate. We, the general public, are the implied beaten person. I have 3 main articles I am drawing from for this post regarding economic conditions, the Fed and other central banks responses and expected outcomes, i.e. what the officials want/hope with all their hearts.

The first and oldest article is from Reuters of July 22^nd titled “Analysis: R.I.P. forward guidance: Inflation forces central banks to ditch messaging tool”. The article is referring to central banks and their guidelines or projections of interest rate changes in the Fed Funds Rate or equivalent central bank rates for other countries. For many years central banks have given a longer term estimate of rates changes. Since June of this year, the Federal Reserve has stepped away from that policy when they raised rates by 75 basis points (bp). Previously they had said they expected 50 bp increases for some time. Instead they raised it 75 bp. Other central banks have raised their equivalent funds rates by wildly differing amounts from their stated goals. This goes back to the old saying, don’t telegraph your plays if you don’t want the opponent to sack your quarterback. The our team in this is the Federal Reserve, the opponent is the stock market/investors and the sack is the ability of the Fed to influence inflation rates. We talked about the market anticipating changes and therefore the change not having the same punch. The Fed and other Central banks have given notice they are no longer going to telegraph their plays. The outcome will be greater volatility in all interest rates and the markets (much wider and wilder ups and downs). The Fed’s hope is that they will have a greater impact on inflation. Again, remember that the Federal Funds Rate which the Fed controls is not a finely crafted and precise economic instrument that the Fed can wield with dexterity, grace and fine precision (regardless of what some in the media, talking heads, and governmental officials may suggest). It is a massive, unwieldy, gross (meaning large and ungainly), ugly (meaning exactly that) blunt force trauma inducing massive piece of economic plate iron. It is about as finely controllable as trying to hit a large, ugly rat (inflation) on a sidewalk by dropping it from a 10 story building onto that same busy sidewalk. The goal is to get the rat and miss the people, streetlights, cars, prams, butterflies and in fact the sidewalk. You will likely get the rat after a number of drops but,…. you will not be able to avoid the non-combatants (i.e., all the non-rat things) regardless of the precision of the drop. Now the governmental response to all this. From July 24^th Reuters article titled,

“U.S. economy slowing but recession not inevitable, Yellen says”.  “I’m not saying that we will definitely avoid a recession,” Yellen said. “But I think there is a path that keeps the labor market strong and brings inflation down.”

Some of the current debate is if we have entered a recession now or not. That kind of thinking is dangerous for the current administration who claims to have things under control or moving in the right direction or improving or something. You may have heard something about redefining what is a recession. The only ones who can declare recession or end of recession is the independent private research group tasked with that job. Governmental administrations try to influence public opinion and other groups but that is all it is, attempted influence.

The last article is from CNBC of August 3^rd. “Fed’s Bullard sees more interest rate hikes ahead and no U.S. recession.” That is the great goal, increase the interest rate (Fed Funds Rate) which will slow inflation, which is running at 9.1%, and do that with ­no recession. And if we really are in trouble we can try to adjust the definition of recession.  Quoting from the article.

“St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard said Wednesday that the central bank will continue raising rates until it sees compelling evidence that inflation is falling.” …“We’re not in a recession right now. We do have these two quarters of negative GDP growth. To some extent, a recession is in the eyes of the beholder,” he said. “With all the job growth in the first half of the year, it’s hard to say there’s a recession. With a flat unemployment rate at 3.6%, it’s hard to say there’s a recession.”

 Again, pick and choose your variables (a very econometric way to do things) and highlight what appears important to make your case which is not unreasonable but you as the reader need to be aware of what is being said and not said by such statements. Bullard is laying out some hard “facts” while not saying just when they will do things (no play telegraphing). The Fed sees the large, ugly rat on the sidewalk (inflation). They tell us they are now focused on the rat. They have their tool to deal with it which many imply is an elegant piece of economic equipment and they are willing to employ it with all the finesse of the large piece of plate iron it is. Elegant no, effective, likely. We are also told they will use it several times, as necessary, to get this rat. You (the public) may be assured and comforted. That is especially true if you like large plate iron induced headaches.

So gentle reader, do I think we are in a recession? The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) will look at the data, after the fact, and declare if there has been one. No one else can do that. The more important questions are how will inflation, shortages, supply chain bottlenecks, wages, job stability and the host of every day, individual and personal impacts affect our ability to grow, love, learn, help, serve and enjoy life and loved ones. I don’t know about a recession by the definition but I do know I need to take time for the more important and personal challenges and opportunities around me. We have had recessions before, we will have them again. Let’s get on with living and doing the best we can under the circumstances.  

Articles quoted / cited:

https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/rip-forward-guidance-inflation-forces-central-banks-ditch-messaging-tool-2022-07-21/

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-economy-is-slowing-recession-not-inevitable-yellen-says-2022-07-24/

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/03/feds-bullard-sees-more-interest-rate-hikes-ahead-and-no-us-recession.html

The Art of the Economic / Financial Forecast

 

 

        Have you watched a child finger paint recently. Some start slowly then add more colors or big swirls. Then at some point mix the colors all together and want to start over. That is a good analogy for today’s markets and the forecasts that are being generated by various parties. What can you make from the mess? There are some nuggets in the mess but they may be more related to the process than the actual information provided. Economic / financial forecasting has a sequence to it. As a new problem is perceived the individual members of the reporting community try to grab the initiative on the other community members by reporting something fastest and loudest. There usually isn’t much substance and very little analysis to the first reports / analysis, mainly noise to generate interest. Quick charts and graphs will be added to give substance but may not be of much value. As the issue develops more concrete information is included as it becomes known, statements from officials, past trends that are thought to be similar to the current unfolding situation. Remember, the new problem has not really developed yet so any comparisons to past data are wild and loose. But there will be charts and graphs and comparisons. As the situation develops, conjectures, suppositions, ideas, comparisons and theories will be put forth and discarded at a rapid rate. There should be lots of conflicting opinions and conflicting charts and graphs. As the situation further develops the initial flurry should settle down a bit with more concrete information based on actual current data. Opinions on the meaning of the data will still swing wildly and there will be many interpretations and many conflicting points, still. At some point the data will tend to support a particular analysis. All the other conflicting statements will be forgotten or just dropped and there will be some general pronouncement from some official, governmental or business leader that many if not most will agree with. There will be a short period of quiet or something like a breather then some news group will perceive a new problem and away they all go again with the reporting community trying to grab the initiative. Several new problems may be simultaneously running depending on the particular economic climate. Our current climate is very conducive to the multiple current problem scenarios. The news groups love this type of environment. There are so many possible new problems that many groups have the opportunity to be first on something. This is the time for them to be looking and jumping on and at any and every new piece of information and rumor.

                So, what are you to do. Take it slow and easy on the new news. Wait for a theory or idea to stand some test of time. As an example, I quote from a CNN Politics article of June 1^st ,Treasury secretary concedes she was wrong on ‘path that inflation would take’ and which were also referred to in a Reuters article of June 7^th, Yellen says inflation to stay high, Biden likely to up forecast,

“US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen admitted Tuesday that she had failed to anticipate how long high inflation would continue to plague American consumers as the Biden administration works to contain a mounting political liability.

"I think I was wrong then about the path that inflation would take," Yellen told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on "The Situation Room" when asked about her comments from 2021 that inflation posed only a "small risk."

The admission was the latest indication that the administration's expectations of a normalizing economy were thrown into disarray by the continuing pandemic and the war in Europe.

"As I mentioned, there have been unanticipated and large shocks to the economy that have boosted energy and food prices and supply bottlenecks that have affected our economy badly that I didn't -- at the time -- didn't fully understand, but we recognize that now," she said.

Yellen and other White House officials once framed inflation as a temporary side effect of the economy returning to normal following the pandemic, pointing to snags in supply chains and demand outstripping supply.”

Yellen has taken more responsibility than is usually done for her comments. The market did call her out on it however. Notice the time frame is 6-8 months,  much too long to wait in the news hungry environment that requires snap statements and quick facts and figures.

                What then are some of the new, new problems that the news folks are jumping on. Stagflation is now starting to show up in articles, recession is much more common and is expected to occur in 2023. The discussion is now when in 2023 for recession, some are saying 2^nd quarter, others late in the year. The shouting has gone from no recession or few saying it was possible, including the governmental officials, to many saying recession is possible even likely. Notice there hasn’t been as much said (or at least not said by the mainstream newsies) about supply chain bottlenecks or the Ukrainian war. Employment figures have become sparce in the last little while. The stock and bond market movements are getting some attention on a periodic basis, mainly when a new high or low is hit. Notice I didn’t specify just how high or low or how relevant it might be. Movement is what seems to be interesting the newsies. Again it comes back to volatility and uncertainty. With uncertainty newsies can make wild statements and maybe they get it right. If they don’t there is very little consequence to being wrong. Remember that, no or very minor consequences for being wrong. Look at Yellen and Powell. No job loss, little or no censure but it is important to have an excuse, the greatest one is “unforeseen circumstances”. In that context everything can be considered unforeseen.

                Good luck and hang in there. Take everything with a grain of salt until some time has passed. Remember the definition of recession requires a look back meaning that we have to have historical data meeting certain criteria before a recession can be declared. It is past tense. We won’t know when a recession has started until after the fact. Many financial situations are like that. It’s not worth getting worked up and panicky about. Enjoy life, family, friends and the beauties around us.  

CNN Article

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/31/politics/treasury-secretary-janet-yellen-inflation-cnntv/index.html

Reuters Article

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-faces-unacceptable-levels-inflation-yellen-tells-senators-2022-06-07/

 

 

Cat on a Hot Tin Roof – Some Explanations and Information

A cat on a hot tin roof is the appropriate image for how the financial markets and economies feel and are reacting at the moment. An avalanche of commentaries and volumes of data are pouring into and being poured over by a myrid of individuals, specialists, talking heads, and governmental bodies. There is no shortage of information, opinion, comment, commentary, noise and confusion. I have found a couple of articles over the past 2 weeks I think may be interesting and helpful. I am including them in their entirety.

Some observations. Quoting from the first line of the Bloomberg article, “The world’s most powerful central bank is about to find out how far it can squeeze financial markets before something breaks.” That sums up exactly what is happening. That is the 900 lbs. gorilla in the room. If or when it breaks, that is recession. The 2^nd article from the Spokane Review (originally from Bankrate.com) is a pretty good discussion on how rising interest rates may impact various financial instruments. Remember, don’t focus on the hype language. Look for the solid information. Good luck. Hang in there and don’t panic.

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2022-world-economy-wall-street-market-worries/

Bloomberg

Everything That Could Go Wrong in Markets as Free-Money Era Ends

By Jack Pitcher, Alexandra Harris, and Alex McIntyre

May 9, 2022, 6:00 AM MDT

The world’s most powerful central bank is about to find out how far it can squeeze financial markets before something breaks. Struggling to tamp down the most pervasive inflation in decades, the Federal Reserve delivered its biggest interest-rate increase since 2000 last week while outlining a plan to begin unwinding trillions of dollars in asset purchases that have kept world markets brimming with cash since the 2020 crash. Its peers will soon follow suit. Bloomberg Economics has estimated that policy makers in the Group of Seven countries from the European Central Bank to the Bank of Canada will shrink balance sheets by about $410 billion combined in the remainder of 2022.

Yet it all comes at one of the most precarious times in recent memory for the global economy. Russia’s war in Ukraine, and the bevy of sanctions that followed, have upended business. Supply chains that were disrupted by the pandemic have grown even tighter, causing chaos for companies lashed by soaring prices for everything from labor to commodities. The worry now is whether central banks can accomplish the high-wire act of weaning Wall Street off unprecedented stimulus, without disrupting the flow of capital and tipping economies into recession.

Bloomberg News canvassed traders, money managers and analysts on their top market indicators to track corporate distress, liquidity shocks and cracks in the financial plumbing. We then analyzed decades of price history to identify the systemic turning points — when central bankers on a hawkish mission risk crashing the real economy.

While there’s little sign of widespread stress yet, some barometers of cross-asset health are moving closer to the danger zone. All that suggests investors are in for a bumpy ride as the Fed drains its unprecedented liquidity measures.

Here are four indicators keeping Wall Street worrywarts on edge.

1. An Upside-Down Bond Market

Like it or not, the U.S. Treasury yield curve remains the top dog economic forecaster on Wall Street — even if the Fed’s bond-buying spree in the pandemic has distorted its message. In normal times, when the business cycle is in good health, the interest rate on debt maturing in, say, 10 years, will be higher than that on shorter-term securities as investors demand more compensation for the risk that inflation down the road will erode returns. If the opposite happens, meaning short-term rates are higher than the longer term, the foreboding dynamic is known as an inversion — signaling a bet that the central bank will eventually have to cut rates in order to salvage growth.

While not every inversion in the yield curve has led to a downturn, prolonged distortions have become eerily accurate, especially when two of the most widely followed curves become inverted at the same time, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Since the beginning of the 1990s, whenever yields on both 3-month Treasury bills and two-year notes have risen above the rate on 10-year bonds, a recession has followed almost without fail within the next six to 18 months. It's a simplified measure — the most recent double inversion preceded a pandemic that no one saw coming — but big moves in yield curves have kept Wall Street on edge recently.

In late March and the start of April, the gap between two- and 10-year yields briefly inverted before normalizing, reflecting market angst that the Fed’s mission to aggressively tighten policy risks sparking a recession by ramping up the cost of money and thereby constraining consumer spending as well as business activity. At the same time, the spread between the three-month Treasury bill and the 10-year yield has been heading in the opposite direction, suggesting a still-healthy outlook for U.S. investment and consumption that gives the central bank room to make good on its policy-tightening plan.

For now, yield-curve worriers are easy to find as the end of the easy-money era rocks global markets. Already this year, the Nasdaq 100 index of technology shares has had the worst start in decades, speculative stock strategies have lost billions and cross-asset volatility has spiked all over the world.

PGIM Chief Executive Officer David Hunt warned last week that signals in the bond market suggest a significant risk of a recession in 2024, while Citadel’s Ken Griffin said the outlook is the most uncertain since the global financial crisis.

2. Disruption to the Flow of Credit

U.S. companies have lost their ability to borrow money at ultra-cheap rates, a direct function of the Fed’s mission to cool the red-hot business cycle that’s stoked inflation for everything, everywhere all at once.

But when borrowing costs surge too far, too fast, the flow of corporate credit can become disrupted or even blocked entirely. In extreme instances, healthy companies can lose access to funding, wreaking economic havoc. This happened most recently during the onset of the pandemic, which forced the Fed to take unprecedented action to keep corporate America afloat.

The most widely followed credit gauge is the additional yield over Treasury bonds that investors demand to hold debt from the largest and strongest U.S. corporations. Currently, the spread on a Bloomberg index of U.S. investment-grade bonds has risen to 1.35 percentage points, from as low as 0.8 percentage point in June 2021, signaling higher borrowing costs that still sit below a key threshold for stress.

When the spread rises above 1.5 percentage points, it’s a warning sign that credit markets could seize up, making borrowing a lot harder, according to analysts and investors informally polled by Bloomberg. The metric has proved a reliable red flag in the past after crossing 2 percentage points in the volatile years after the global financial crisis and during the pandemic fallout.

To illustrate how the flow of credit across the entire U.S. economy can constrict, Bloomberg examined commercial and industrial loan data from all commercial banks, published monthly by the Federal Reserve.

The analysis, dating back to 1989, shows that when investment-grade credit spreads approach and exceed 2 percentage points, a threshold that’s been crossed just six times over that period, a contraction in loan growth almost always follows.

In January 2008, for example, borrowing costs for investment-grade companies soared to more than 2 percentage points for the first time in more than five years. Risk premiums remained above that level for nearly two years, and a prolonged slowdown in commercial and industrial loan volumes came next. Loan volumes fell for two years beginning in November 2008, causing historic damage to the world economy.

More recently, credit spreads spiked to over 3.5 percentage points in the March 2020 selloff. Yet some of the easiest borrowing conditions on record took hold in the following year as the Fed pumped liquidity into the financial system and even offered to buy corporate bonds directly.

Now premiums are back on the rise and company debt is becoming volatile. Investors and companies alike will be watching whether borrowing costs spike into risky territory that would disrupt the flow of credit once more.

3. The Junk Penalty

Borrowers with weak balance sheets were given a reprieve after the Fed and other central banks rode to the rescue in the dark days of the pandemic. For the better part of two years, credit was dirt cheap and defaults became virtually non-existent. But the liquidity party is coming to a rapid end as interest rates rise — with new speculative-rated debt offerings this year falling to the lowest volume since 2009.

A recent bond sale from Carvana Co., for example, initially struggled to attract investors, and the used-car company ended up paying a whopping 10.25% yield while buyers demanded a clause intended to help shield them from losses if the company were to head to bankruptcy court. Similar cases abound.

A measure investors are watching closely is the extra risk premium that bond buyers demand to own debt from the lowest-rated companies compared to investment-grade peers. Call it the junk-bond penalty. When this premium goes up, it makes borrowing more costly and less accessible to issuers who need the funding the most, especially those who have poor credit ratings due to weak cash flows or high debt loads compared to their earnings.

If firms that have limited money on reserve and debt coming due in the near future lose access to primary markets, that makes defaults and bankruptcies more likely — bad news for growth-minded policy makers at the White House.

For most of the post-pandemic era, junk-rated companies across the globe paid little more to borrow than some of the biggest corporations — an average of just 2.4 percentage points more during 2021, a year that saw some of the easiest credit conditions ever, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That made corporate failures exceptionally rare. But the tide is starting to turn. The junk penalty climbed above 3 percentage points last week. While that’s below the historical average of about 4 percentage points, the fast pace of liquidity tightening could soon cause trouble for the most vulnerable of companies. Since 2000, when the junk penalty has climbed above 5 percentage points and held above that level for an extended period, defaults have almost always risen above the historic norm, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

4. Short–term money markets crack

The Fed’s massive pandemic stimulus program caused excess liquidity in the financial system to balloon, with banks flush with record cash in the form of reserves. Now, as the monetary authority begins to pare a $9 trillion balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening, Wall Street is on high alert for any resulting logjams in the financial plumbing.

When the Fed starts to shrink asset holdings — by simply not replacing maturing securities — there will be an increase in the number of Treasuries and mortgage bonds in search of a home in the private sector. And the amount of reserves held in the banking system will fall by design.

No one knows how any of this will ultimately play out. But the last time the central bank embarked on quantitative tightening, bad things eventually happened in late 2019. Banks saw their reserves fall sharply — fueling a disruptive spike in interest rates on so-called repurchase agreements, a keystone of short-term funding markets. That caused liquidity headaches all around and forced the central bank to intervene in the funding markets.

The Fed has since implemented additional tools to help reduce these liquidity risks. But all bets are off. Some two and half years ago, total reserves held by depository institutions at the Fed slid to around $1.4 trillion. That was enough to cause liquidity issues in overnight lending, even though banks at the time considered $700 billion as the lowest threshold for comfort.

This time round, Barclays Plc estimates the tipping point at some $2 trillion versus $3.3 trillion currently. All this is guesswork with few historic precedents, so the reserve level will be a key focus for risk watchers well before it hits this point.

All in, traders around the world are bracing for a disruptive tightening in financial conditions on multiple fronts, from bonds and credit to money markets, as the Fed spoonfeeds markets with liquidity no longer.

“We have never been able to reduce inflation by more than 2 percentage points in the U.S. historically without inducing recession,” said Guggenheim Partners Chief Investment Officer Scott Minerd at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Los Angeles. “I think that it's going to be really hard for the Fed to maneuver into a soft landing.”

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/may/09/biggest-winners-and-losers-from-the-feds-interest-/

The Spokesman Review - Spokane, Washington

Biggest winners and losers from the Fed's interest rate hike

Updated: Mon, May 9, 2022

Spokane, Washington

James Royal    Bankrate.com (TNS)

Last week, the Federal Reserve announced that it’s raising interest rates by half a percentage point, bumping the federal funds rate to a target range of 0.75 to 1.00 percent. The move follows an increase of 0.25 percent in March, as the Fed continues reducing liquidity to the financial markets to help tamp down soaring inflation.

The central bank also announced that it was further reducing stimulus to financial markets by letting its holdings of bonds decline over time. The Fed will work its way up to letting about $95 billion in bonds roll off its balance sheet every month, reducing liquidity by about $1 trillion per year.

The Fed’s move comes as inflation rages in the U.S. economy at the highest annual rate in some 40 years, hitting 8.5 percent in March. With the Fed hitting the brakes on an overheated economy, the main question for many market watchers is how fast Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell & Co. will continue to raise rates.

“The Federal Reserve is behind the curve on inflation and has a lot of catching up to do,” says Greg McBride, CFA, Bankrate chief financial analyst. “This means rate hikes at successive meetings for the first time in 16 years, and for the first time in 22 years, a larger half-point hike.”

At about 3 percent, the 10-year Treasury bond is now at its highest level since late 2018, as markets price in the expectation of sustained inflation and rising rates. After some ups and downs in 2021, the benchmark bond has soared since December 2021 and especially since the start of March, when it sat at just 1.65 percent.

As the Fed embarks on what appears to be a longer period of raising rates, here are the winners and losers from its latest decision.

1. Mortgages

While the federal funds rate doesn’t really impact mortgage rates, which depend largely on the 10-year Treasury yield, they’re often moving the same way for similar reasons. With the 10-year Treasury yield zooming higher in recent months, as the market prices in expectations of the Fed raising rates, mortgage rates have risen alongside them.

“Mortgage rates have bounded higher by 2 full percentage points since the end of 2021, one of the largest and fastest run-ups in history,” says McBride. “Mortgage rates move well in advance of Fed action and the outlook for inflation and the economy will be the key determinants of what we see with mortgage rates in the months ahead. Until we see signs inflation has peaked, the risk is definitely to the upside.”

The run-up in rates – following the rapid rise in housing prices over the past couple years – has created a double whammy for potential homebuyers. Home prices are more expensive and the financing is pricier, resulting in a slowdown in the housing market.

So would-be homebuyers are worse off by the rise in rates.

2. Home equity

The cost of a home equity line of credit (HELOC) will be ratcheting higher, since HELOCs adjust relatively quickly to changes in the federal funds rate. HELOCs are typically linked to the prime rate, the interest rate that banks charge their best customers.

Those with outstanding balances on their HELOC will see rates tick up, though interest expenses may continue to be low historically. A low rate is also beneficial for those looking to take out a HELOC, and it can be a good time to comparison-shop for the best rate.

But with rates moving higher, even a little bit, and the expectation that they’ll move higher still as the year progresses, those with outstanding HELOC balances should expect to see their payments continue to rise in the near term.

3. Credit cards

Many variable-rate credit cards change the rate they charge customers based on the prime rate, which is closely related to the federal funds rate. The Fed’s decision means that interest on variable-rate cards will move higher now.

“Credit card rates will march higher in step with the Federal Reserve, and often follow within one or two statement cycles,” says McBride. “Pay down credit card debt now because it will only get more expensive and you don’t want that debt hanging over your head, should the economy topple into recession.”

If you have an outstanding balance on your cards, then you’re going to get hit with higher costs. With rates projected to rise for a while, it could also be a welcome opportunity to shop for a new credit card with a more competitive rate.

Low rates on credit cards are largely a non-issue if you’re not running a balance.

4. Savings accounts and CDs

Rising interest rates mean that banks will offer rising returns on their savings and money market accounts, but will likely adjust their yields at a measured pace.

Account holders who recently locked in CD rates will retain those yields for the term of the CD, unless they’re willing to pay a penalty to break it.

Those with savings accounts may look forward to rising rates, but it’s off a low base, as most banks quickly ratcheted rates to near zero following the Fed’s emergency cuts in March 2020.

“Yields on certificates of deposit have started to pick up and we’ll see the same in savings yields, although with a bit of a lag,” says McBride. “The outlook for the next year or so is much better than what savers have endured over the past three years, where rates fell and then inflation took off.”

“It will take a while, but as rate hikes continue, the returns savers get will rise and inflation will hopefully decline,” he says.

Savers looking to maximize their earnings from interest should turn to online banks, where rates are typically much better than those offered by traditional banks.

5. Stock and cryptocurrency investors

A huge boon for the stock market has been the Fed’s willingness to keep rates at near zero for an extended period of time. Low rates have been beneficial for stocks, making them look like a more attractive investment in comparison to rates on bonds and fixed income investments such as CDs. But that’s changing.

In the last few months, investors have been pricing in the potential for rate increases, with the S&P 500 starting 2022 in a deep slump.

“The market went up with little hesitation while the Federal Reserve was pumping stimulus into the economy, but now that they’re removing that stimulus, market volatility has returned,” says McBride. “Particularly susceptible have been the high-octane growth stocks that were the primary beneficiaries of low interest rates, with investors now questioning what value to put on those stocks in a higher interest-rate environment.”

Cryptocurrencies have also been feeling the brunt since November, when the Fed more clearly telegraphed its intentions to reduce liquidity in the financial system. Bitcoin, Ethereum and other major cryptos are well off their 52-week highs and have shown a solid downtrend over the last few months, as they priced in reduced stimulus and the potential for higher interest rates.

The Fed’s reduction in its own bond portfolio should further decrease support for stocks and crypto.

6. The U.S. federal government

With the national debt above $30 trillion, rising rates will raise the costs of the federal government as it rolls over debt and borrows new money. Of course, the government has benefited for decades from a secular decline in interest rates. While rates might rise cyclically during an economic boom, they’ve been moving steadily lower long term.

For now, the interest rates on debt remain at historically attractive levels, with 10-year and 30-year Treasurys running well below inflation. As long as inflation remains higher than interest rates, the government is slowly taking advantage of inflation, paying down prior debts with today’s less valuable dollars. That’s an attractive prospect for the government, of course, but not for those who buy its debt.

Bottom line

Inflation has been running hot over much of the last year, and the Fed is raising interest rates to combat it. But rates still do remain low by historical standards, at least for now, so it makes sense to think about how to take advantage, for example, by being more discriminating when it comes to shopping for rates on your savings accounts or CDs.

(Visit Bankrate online at bankrate.com.)

©2022 Bankrate.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

How to Maintain Your Financial Health in Unhealthy Times

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-26/deutsche-bank-sees-5-6-fed-target-rate-and-deep-u-s-recession

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-03/investors-are-so-bearish-on-stocks-that-the-market-looks-bullish

 https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/yellen-sees-solid-growth-possible-soft-landing-for-u-s-economy-1.1761068#:~:text=(Bloomberg)%20%2D%2D%20Treasury%20Secretary%20Janet,moves%20to%20bring%20down%20inflation

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/u-s-stocks-roar-as-powell-quells-fear-of-jumbo-hikes-1.1760681

https://apnews.com/article/business-stock-markets-asia-sydney-hong-kong-c341786b3e475916247b2fcd5c07602f

                There is a concept in behavioral economics called loss aversion. It refers to the situation that a real or potential loss is perceived either psychologically or emotionally as being more severe than an equivalent or equal gain. We feel more deeply for a loss than a gain or the loss of $100 is far greater than the joy of gaining $100. For greater insight into this concept check out Nassim Talab’s book, Fooled by Randomness. I recommend it for this and many other things. This applied to today’s comments on several levels.

                I have included several articles on the recent happenings in the markets and with various statements by banking and governmental officials which need to be read in order listed to show the progression of thoughts and ideas in the last two weeks. I had a discussion earlier this week with someone who wanted to know what they should be investing in. They didn’t think I had given a very satisfactory answer when I suggested they shouldn’t be doing any investing. I would go so far as to suggest that looking at financial news with the intent of investing should not be done right now. Don’t look or follow or even think about financial news, at least not if you are looking for information to help you choose investments or trying out some strategy suggested by a financial advisor or even well meaning friend. Because the only thing that will happen is you will feel rotten or worse, hopeless. Any investment decision you make right now will result in some loss, possibly a lot of loss and remember, loses contain more negative punch than comparable gains. Granted, your current investments may be taking a hit but then you are not following my initial counsel to avoid looking at financial news with the intent to invest. Think back to the first paragraph about loss aversion. Right now the market is so all over the place any gains (feeling some little good) will be massively offset by losses (feeling much more bad). The articles I have included / listed show how in just a couple of weeks we have gone from despair to euphoria to despair (not quite that extreme but you get the point).

                The first article from Deutsche Bank (April 26, 2022) suggests we will definitely have a recession in 2023 and that the Fed monetary policy needs to be very aggressive, i.e. really jumping the Fed Funds rate up a lot and often. The second article from Bloomberg dated May 3, 2022 suggests investors are too Bearish. “Investors have become so negative about the stock market that Wall Street [read smart money] is starting [to] think a rally may be on the way.” They give several technical metrics to support their thinking. The Third article from BNN Bloomberg (May 4, 2022) states Yellen thinks the Fed can make a “soft landing” for the economy. Again, a couple of reasons are listed. We have a very negative article (recession next year) followed by 2 very positive articles (market likely going up and no recession next year).

                The last two articles show what actually happened. The BNN Bloomberg article is from May 4, 2022 the day of the Fed meeting and the AP article is from May 5, 2022 the day after the Fed meeting. The May 4^th article is after the meeting and gives the reaction of markets during the next few hours. Markets are up 3%, joy and jubilation. Several reasons are given including that Chairman Powell says that .75% Fed Funds Rate increases are off the table. All is roses and smells great (an emotional gain). The next day the markets falls 3% (an emotional loss). How could this happen, the fiscal doves had taken over, the world was roses, champagne had been flowing. The talking heads had spoken. We are told in the AP News article that “yesterday’s sharp rally was not rooted in reality and today’s dramatic selloff is a reversal of that misplaced exuberance”. Exactly what does that mean. So, yesterday pundits couldn’t read the signs but today they can? What about tomorrow’s swings, for there certainly will be swings. Will those signs be read correctly? What will be the greater insight and understanding that will allow for reasoned understanding and the ability to plot the market and world economies, especially on a day to day basis. Now do you see why you should not be reading the financial news thinking about investing. The financial noise is so loud individuals can’t hear, let alone think in any kind of reasonable manner. There is little real information in the noise that would allow for reasoned decisions. The financial pundits will never apologize for, attempt to correct nor take any responsibility for any misconception, error or misleading statements . You will find contradictions among the nuggets of truth and accurate information. It is the nature of financial noise because remember, in the markets, information is power and financial noise may contain useful information and….. may not. How do you tell (it is extremely difficult).  

                What should you be doing at this point or any point in which you need to make financial decisions. Think of the tortoise and the hare or slow and steady. Limit your debt to necessities like education, housing (don’t ever consider variable rate financing – too many potential problems) and transportation. Have a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, mutual funds. Remember, stocks are usually a longer term investment with the expectation that they will go up and down, mainly up over the longer term. Bonds tend to be a bit more stable and many times move opposite stocks (but not always) and mutual funds, to get more diversity from smaller investments. A mix is good. Look at rebalancing your investments on a regular basis, a good financial advisor can help.

                Hang in there. These are unhealthy times for those that immerse themselves in the dirty waters of too much financial noise (news). Watch from the sidelines. Keep to the regular and steady investing schedules you have established before and don’t think you can time or out smart the market.

 

Why So Much Uncertainty? Recession, Slowdown, Retrenchment

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-11/world-markets-are-falling-again-with-echoes-of-the-2018-rout

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/junkiest-junk-bonds-flash-a-warning-sign-for-the-economy-1.1754017

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/apr/19/imf-governments-covid-debt-world-economic-outlook

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/u-s-economy-to-see-modest-recession-next-year-fannie-mae-says-1.1753874

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/u-s-economy-to-see-modest-recession-next-year-fannie-mae-says-1.1753874

                Yesterday the dentist put a new crown on a tooth for me. It was the culmination of about 3 weeks of pain, discomfort and unpleasantness. I was enjoying the ability to chew on both sides of my mouth this morning when another tooth broke. What a mess. I have an appointment with the dentist at 4:00 pm today for another crown (that is another very personal economic hit). This is kind of like the economy at the moment. We are suffering through one problem and something else gets added. I have 5 articles (2 of them very short)  I think may be interesting relating to national and world thinking on interest rates, markets and recession thinking.

                The first article from Bloomberg dated 4/12/22 World Markets are Falling Again With Echoes of the 2018 Rout, discusses various watched indicators and what they are doing. Fed officials and comments on Fed Funds Rate increases, stocks and bond market changes, recession comments all add to a cacophony of noises and sounds some helpful most mainly noise. The article uses words like rout, economic retrenchment, hawkishness, stampede, fear, hunkering down, all designed to create tension, show action or just to jar the senses. You see such things in the daily news relating to most stories. I am afraid it is the current fad in news reporting in general and financial markets and reporting are no different. So, can we cut through some of the rhetoric, yes we can. For example, in the Bloomberg article referenced above there are two or three items you should look at. One, the Fed is staying the course with rate hikes. There is talk of 75 basis points (bp or .75%) increases from various sources. That is an indication that the Fed is more worried about inflation than recession which they have stated before and they are not as afraid of recession. They are hoping for no or a very mild recession which is possible. The economic and financial indicators are currently giving  very mixed messages and advisors and officials are having a hard time gaining helpful information from those messages. This is not unexpected or unusual. Officials and markets will be trying to discern a direction or an intensity or a trend from all the market and data signals. Don’t hang your hat on any one piece of information regardless of how loudly or strongly someone pushes it at this point.

                The second Bloomberg article dated 4/19/22, Junkiest Junk Bonds Flash a Warning Sign for the Economy, suggests the junk bond (very low credit worthiness) market, by its recent increase in costs of borrowing, is signaling that a recession is becoming more likely. Maybe yes and maybe…… yes. The article lists several indicators that are supporting what they think is more likely to be pointing to recession or at the very least, a significant economic slowdown (or retrenchment). A slowdown may or may not fall into a recession, there are some technical definitions that separate the two. Some consider a slowdown or retrenchment a very mild recession (negative growth in GDP and a few other indicators) but if you don’t have to use the recession word, especially as a Fed official, that is very good. The article lists several indicators that are pointing various directions including uncertainty caused by the war. Remember, markets don’t handle uncertainty well at all and tend to bounce and wiggle alarmingly when they are subjected to much of any uncertainty. They are currently being subjected to very large quantities of uncertainty. They will be very unsettled. Depending on when some news story is generated, the conclusions of the story may be way up or way down. It is more important to watch trends but the news will not generally do that. You will tend to get the Chicken Little report (the sky is falling, the sky is falling) rather than something measured. Try to look for the measured.

                The next article is from The Guardian. I don’t have a lot of experience with this particular rag. It bills itself as “the world’s leading liberal voice”. I am not certain exactly what that means but the article seems pretty good. They are discussing the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and some of its thinking and findings. The article is short but I think fairly informative. I would like to quote a couple of sections;

“The IMF also warns the war has exacerbated two tricky policy dilemmas, one facing central banks and one troubling finance ministers.

For central banks, such as the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve, the issue is how to tackle mounting cost of living crises without killing off still incomplete recoveries from the pandemic. That’s not going to be easy, as the IMF freely admits.

For finance ministers, such as Rishi Sunak, it is getting the balance right between protecting the most vulnerable while repairing the damage caused to the public finances by Covid-19 spending. The IMF understands the difficulties but warns against being too penny-pinching.”

The article also points out the global supply chain disruptions and suggests world markets are becoming more fragmented which they consider, not good. Germany is considered the big power in Europe and no one wants to remember the problem of a large powerful Germany with economic power (think WWII). One of the ideas of the European Union was and is to bind France and Germany (and the others) so closely together they can’t swing fists at each other. Supply chain problems makes it so economies and businesses stockpile resources and such which makes them less dependent on each other to some extent. The IMF is suggesting something similar about Russia and the war. The war is driving a wedge into positive relationships which were being created over the last 20 to 30 years between Russia and the European Union countries and creating economic disconnections which help drive nations apart. In positive times, the interlocking economies help reduce friction and give a reason to work together. Another reason several European countries are less vocal than others concerning the Ukraine / Russian conflict (like Great Britain who has its own oil supplies and other sources and is very vocal) is that Russian natural resources especially natural gas and oil supply a large percentage of European needs. That is part of what the IMF is referring to in its “supply chain” comments as have other world financial leaders done in the last several weeks. Moscow has the ability to be an unreliable supplier and many European nations are staring that big problem square in the face. A little economic blackmail can certainly be and likely will be part of Putin’s overall game plan for Eastern Europe.

                The last article is really 2 sources for the same information. I thought you might like to see the different reporting of the same information. BNN Bloomberg and The Hill reported on Fannie Mae’s  (the governmental housing arm) comments on recession. Fannie Mae is suggesting we will have a recession in 2023. You can see from the short articles. Quoting from the BNN Bloomberg article;

“Rising interest rates at the U.S. Federal Reserve will further slow an economy already weighed down by high inflation and the fallout from the Russian invasion of Ukraine, causing a “modest contraction” [recession] in the second half of 2023, according to Fannie Mae.”

Short and sweet. Expect to see more statements like this from various bank economists, quasi-governmental agencies, like Fannie Mae, and world economists. Whether its called a recession, economic slowdown, economic retrenchment or something else. Look for higher interest rates, slowing grow rate to negative growth rate (recession) or maybe, just hopefully, a cooling of the overheated economies and a return to more normal growth in housing and prices. One can and should hope for the best but prepare for something else.