The Year of More of the Same

  

        I have two pieces of information before me on my desk. One is from Winters & Co. Advisors, LLC, an investment agent who I have worked with over the years. The Winters document contains a chart showing the swap yield curve for the last 4 years based on today’s date (swap rates tend to closely follow same maturity treasuries). The most recent 2 years shows an inverted yield curve in the 4% to 6% range. The curves for 2020 and 2021 show normal sloping curves in the range of 0% to 1.95%. The second document is a short story from the Wall Street Journal of today with the headline, “As inflation cools, economists see soft landing for US”. What a ride we have had for the last two plus years. We have been riding the Fed induced rollercoaster since mid-2021 when inflation started its climb from the benchmark of 2% (4.2% - Apr 2021) to its high of 9.1% in June of 2022. It slowly trended downward through the balance of 2022 and finally was back down to 3% in June of this year. The rate trended up to 3.7% through September and is 3.2% for October according to US inflation Calculator (usinflationcalculatior.com/inflation/current-inflation-rates/). Remember, the Fed moved the goal posts last year when it said that they would be happy if long term inflation would stay in the 3.0% range as opposed to its 30 year target range of 2.0%. The Wall Street article states “Economists continue to see the US economy approaching a soft landing as inflation data comes in better than expected, with little signs of impending recession. This would mark the first time in 80 years the Federal Reserve has brought down inflation without triggering a recession.” Not bad if it does happen, i.e. no recession triggered. However, the Fed doesn’t have a very good track record and they did move the goal posts to make it easier to claim success. So, change the rules, take 2 ½ years to do something that many times (one can’t say normally in economic situations) takes 6 to 8 months and declare victory at the new levels, maybe. I see that the Wall Street group is the first on the soft landing band wagon in this current time period. Do you remember the movie Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines (1965 comedy). It goes on to say something like, they go uppity up up, they go downdity down down. I am afraid we have been doing the up down routine along the bottom of the economic landscape for the last 2 ½ years.

      No, we haven’t had an official recession yet but we haven’t had much growth in the economy either. We have a very high Federal Fund rate that looks to stay high for some time to come according to Chairman Powell. In the Associated Press article of November 1, 2023, “Federal Reserve leaves its key rate unchanged but keeps open possibility of a future hike” I quote;

The central bank’s latest statement noted that the economy “expanded at a strong pace” in the July-September quarter and that job gains “remain strong.” And it reiterated that future rate hikes, if the Fed finds them necessary, remain under consideration.

But it also acknowledged that recent tumult in the financial markets has sent interest rates on 10-year Treasury notes to near 16-year highs and contributed to higher loan rates across the economy — a trend that helps serve the Fed’s goal of cooling the economy and inflation pressures.

Powell himself suggested that Fed officials remain unsure about whether further rate increases might still be needed to defeat inflation. That stance marks a shift from earlier this year, when the policymakers had made clear that they leaned toward pushing rates higher.

I am curious to see if the Fed will consider inflation beaten at a 2% rate or the newer Fed suggested 3% rate. It sounds like the Fed is watching and ready to hike the Fed Funds rate more if necessary. Not a strong sign of reduced volatility as the higher rate tends to make other aspects of the economy volatile and unpredictable. The good news is the Fed hasn’t forgotten about the huge balance sheet problem which is and was one of the primary driving forces for the inflation explosion in the first place. Remember the huge balance sheet was fueled by artificially low borrowing rates for so very, very long. In a Reuters article of October 31, 2023 I again quote;

The eventual end of the Federal Reserve’s efforts to reduce its vast bond holdings increasingly appears tied to what happens with the central bank's "reverse repo" operations.

The program, launched nearly a decade ago, grew rapidly starting in the spring of 2021 and by June 2022 was consistently taking in more than $2 trillion a day in what was seen as clear evidence of the amount of excess cash sloshing around the financial system. Inflows have dropped sharply in recent months to around $1 trillion in the face of the Fed's aggressive policy tightening underway since last year.

Lou Crandall, chief economist with Wrightson ICAP, a research firm …  reckons the Fed still has time in this process, and speaking earlier this month, Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester agreed.

"We still have a very large balance sheet" so the balance sheet cuts can likely continue over the next year and half to two years, she said, adding when it comes to getting to the finish line, "it's going to take a while."

    So, what might we see regarding inflation, economic growth, and a return to normal (whatever normal may be 😊)? Well, that’s just it. I suspect more of the same which is a fair amount of uncertainty and ambiguity plus a large dose of prevarication by the various economic gurus, and financial and governmental leaders. I am afraid we aren’t going to know until we know. Or at the very earliest after the fact (yup, after the fact). Not much comfort. However what you can do is stay conservative in your investments. Don’t concentrate your holdings but spread things out. Don’t go for financial or investing fads. Save as you can, spend less, and find ways to enjoy things more like family, friends, the beauties around us. Don’t worry to much about the economy. It has survived several other difficult times regardless of what people, institutions and governments do to it. Things will of course certainly, almost without fail, very likely, probably, in most cases solve themselves, we think. (But don’t quote us on that.)

Articles cited.

Federal Reserve leaves its key rate unchanged but keeps open possibility of a future hike

https://apnews.com/article/inflation-interest-rates-prices-economy-federal-reserve-63f5a7ed041d6b55c7aa773d071a05fb

Fed’s reverse repo facility drawdown looms large in balance sheet debate

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/feds-reverse-repo-facility-drawdown-looms-large-balance-sheet-debate-2023-10-31/

The Sword of Damocles - Recession Discussion & Related Thoughts

Sword of Damocles
by Richard Westall

            We start the new year with the sword of Damocles poised over the national and world financial markets. The articles are a smattering of comments, commentary and conjecture from market gurus (both national and world) and federal officials tasked with knowing what is going on. Much of the thinking is still relating to recession but a new term is being introduced into the discussion. Additionally, many are discussing just what and when a recession may or may not occur and Powell (Fed Chairman) is trying to keep the Fed focused on is core responsibility. A typical month in the life of the financial world with many pronouncements, much hand wringing and many loud protestations. So, let’s dive into the murky waters and see just what we can see (or not see).

                A new term is being floated to describe the current financial situation, “slowcession”. Apparently the phrase was coined by Cristian deRitis and used by Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi. It means economic growth “comes to a near standstill but never slips into reverse [recession].” Every economic downturn and upturn for that matter, is a bit different and past historical data can only give limited help in describing any current situation. We won’t know how this recession or as noted above, slowcession, will look until after the fact. It will probably have several differing characteristics from previous recessions but will meet the basic definition of recession. Do we know how this recession will play out, no. Are there some ideas, yes, many. Will any of the ideas be correct. Maybe. Then again they may all be wrong or at least mostly wrong. Then again, with all the possible ideas and conjectures floated over the past 12 months there is likely to be a couple of the ideas that will hit close to what actually happens. Remember, we have had so many possible scenarios described from the death of the markets to no recession that all possible options have at least been considered. Something has to hit, given enough shots taken. So, we don’t really know but we have some ideas on a recession and its impacts.

                The Guardian (London) collected comments from a variety of international economists and financial gurus and gives us a cross-section of thinking. They suggest from their sources that we should “brace for another turbulent year in the financial markets”. (Nothing new there.) Their comments suggest possible improvement and likely fall of markets, particularly the US. The head of the International Monetary Fund suggests that a third of the world’s economies are in recession which is likely “because the three big economies – US, EU and China – are all slowing down simultaneously”. Some are suggesting a global recession this year. Much of the speculation is based on what economists and other believe will be the response by central banks to the high inflation rate, which will be raising governmental monies interest rates. An interesting side comment, the article suggests that Russia’s economy is already in recession caused in large part by Putin’s failure to find an easy way out of the war.

                I have selected 3 articles on recession comments. The Bond Buyer (1/24/23) brings several analysts’ comments together suggesting recession is necessary. Some economists are suggesting a modest recession (Wells Fargo Securities and others) during 2023, others think more than modest. There is now discussion about the impact of the recession on inflation. Remember, recessions are supposed to kill inflation. Some are suggesting inflation will remain above the Fed target of 2.0% and be in the range of 2.5% to 3.5% for at least a decade. The solution to higher than target rates, the Fed can always move its target upward and declare victory in the war on inflation. That wouldn’t surprise me. Finally, there is some discussion that we will have a split year. Good for half and bad for half. Don’t know which half first. BNN Bloomberg (1/5/23) is a discussion by St. Louis Fed Reserve Bank President James Bullard that Fed Funds Rates are getting closer to high enough to bring down inflation. The thought by many from his comment is that the Fed still has some increases to come. The question is will they be .25% or .50% increases. The market views a slowing increase as positive at this point. Several Fed officials are still concerned that inflation is to high or way to high. That points to bigger increases. The 3^rd article from Reuters (1/25/23) is about the impact of all this to investors. The article warns that many “heavyweights [are] warn[ing] of pain ahead despite market’s recent reprieve”. Even though recent market movements have been positive or optimistic, most are warning that recession is still likely. The article states, “correctly gauging the economy is crucial for investors”. The statement is absolutely correct and impossible to do. Remember that. Don’t try. No one can. Ever. Don’t do it. In spite of what many say especially talk radio financial hosts and slick financial advisors. And of course many believe they know more. Some very few will get very lucky and be correct and you will hear about them and their phenomenal good skills (luck is not a skill). The majority (most) will get it wrong and there will never be any report on them or their numbers.

                Stay your course. Don’t panic or as the British war message stated “Keep Calm and Carry On”. Keep your debts manageable / low. Don’t borrow without careful thought. Save and above all….. enjoy life, friends, family and the beauties around us. Be grateful. I am.

Articles used:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/02/global-economic-forecast-for-2023-a-stormy-start-followed-by-a-ray-of-hope

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/03/economy/moodys-us-economy-slowcession/index.html

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/fed-s-bullard-says-rates-are-getting-closer-to-sufficiently-high-1.1866262

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/wall-street-heavyweights-warn-against-goldilocks-hopes-2023-01-25/ 

Hang On For A Rough Ride

                  As the old saying goes, hang on, things are likely to get a bit rough. I have pulled financial news articles from the past week or so. Financial thinking has been fairly consistent for the past weeks and the most recent 10 days have been fairly typical. By consistent I mean, lots of uncertainty, markets and thinking are moving up, down and sideways most all of the time. Nobody really knows much of anything but there is lots of noise.

First, a good article from Think Advisor (10/24/22) concerning the annual meeting of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), an organization I subscribe to and is very much an industry standard. The meeting is attended by many big wigs from finance and government. Janet Yellen, secretary of the Treasury, spoke at the meeting (more on that later). One of the panel discussions included several business economists discussing inflation and recession among other things. Several are now predicting that there will be a recession in 2023. The participants listed several factors supporting their conclusion. The factors are the same as have been discussed before, inflation being the 800 lbs. gorilla in the room. The article gives some good comments and supports for their conclusions. Much of the current discussion involves estimating and second guessing the Fed and its inflation response. Since the 1970s and Alan Greenspan’s solution to inflation the Fed has been terrified of any type of uncontrolled inflation. The solution in the 1970s just about destroyed the US economy before it corrected itself. Corrected itself is also correct, Alan Greenspan and the Fed did not fix the 1970s economy but they made it possible for it (the economy) to rebalance itself – governments and individuals don’t control economies in spite of what they say, economies control governments and people. The Greenspan solution was one that worked or at least that was what governmental and financial think tank gurus came up with that worked, and it did work. Governmental officials and politicians ever since then will do just about anything to avoid that situation again. The problem is that much of the fiscal and governmental policies of the past 20 years have been such that it supports inflationary growth. Then the loose money supply accompanied with artificially low interest rates (yes, dear reader, rates have been artificially low for 20 years, held down by direct intervention from the Fed which allowed government to pursue its various expansionary agendas) got away from the governmental people as it had to do. The low interest rates and expanding money supply couldn’t go on forever but for 20 years governmental types have been kicking that can down the road until now. That is why the current administration is howling that the current inflation isn’t their fault but they are willing to add to the problem by increasing governmental spending by unprecedented amounts which is very inflationary. Hence, trying to kick the can down the road again but the financial system has reached its limit. Goods and services are not able to absorb the excess funds without adjusting and that means prices have to go up, in this case way up, way fast (the basic definition of inflation) as we have seen in the last 8 months. That is why the big concern. This looks a lot like the inflation rates of the 1970s. The cure is of course, recession, the rapid deceleration of spending and the removal of the excess money from the system. It would really help shorten the recession and cause it to be less severe if government curtailed spending, reduced governmental needs and did not fund new programs without also including revenue sources (net funding). All of which the current administration refuses to consider but instead is increasing spending and unfunded programs. We have to wait for price increases to begin to slow or stop (in spite of the governmental spending headwinds) as supply and demand are brought into closer alignment, i.e. demand does not outstrip supply and so prices are normalized and we don’t have too many dollars chasing too few goods. We have to weather inflation as price and supply try to find some sort of new equilibrium. I am afraid inflation hits very unevenly in these situations. It is inherently unfair, unjust and unkind. 

                Again, the mechanism to get inflation under control or rather, under more control is to dry out the excess money from the economy and that is done by making money more difficult or expensive to acquire and use. It has to cost more. The interest rates we pay is the control mechanism. Hence, the Fed Funds Rate helps increase or decrease what it costs to borrow and use money. In the second article by Reuters (10-24-22), Yellen is trying to make the point that the Treasury is aware of the problems of drying out the economy and at least in the area she has some control over is attempting to assure the financial system that the government is willing and able to keep one of the major secondary problems caused by inflation at bay. The problem is that as the cheap money (low borrowing costs, relatively speaking, caused by very low interest rates) dries up, investors become unwilling to speculate and began to draw their funds out of banks and financial institutions and put it in safer places such as Treasury instruments or cash (again safer is relative). Banks and financial institutions use leverage to earn additional profits by using borrowed money to invest. You take your money, they have to go find money somewhere on a short basis to cover your withdrawals. In the great recession of 2008 there wasn’t enough liquid funds available to meet the withdrawal needs and the government bailed out many financial institutions by printing more money among other things and almost wasn’t fast enough in responding (TARP if anyone remembers). Several big financial firms didn’t survive or were absorbed. Yellen is trying to tell the markets she is aware of the situation and it is under control which may or may not be accurate but we can hope.

                The Bloomberg article of 10-21-22 is a discussion of what Fed Funds Rates may be and why or why not. There is some speculation that Fed Funds rates may need to be as high as 4.75% - 5.0%. The Fed is trying to give the impression of controlling inflation and the financial institutions are trying to act like the Fed has some control. Both are incorrect. The Fed can’t “control” inflation and financial institutions are not really supporting the Fed but trying to find any place to hide away from the train wreck that is coming. As an aside, the financial economists are having a heyday because they can predict just about anything and there is a pretty good chance they will be correct at some point, for a change. Watch to see who claims they got the forecast right and what part of the forecast in the next 18 months or so. I need to flog a dead horse again. The Fed can not control inflation with any kind of fine tuning. Watch and see, at the very most they can nudge the inflation rate around. The Fed will get this whole process wrong (as measured by various financial institutions, markets and money gurus). But they may be able to influence inflation to some extent. According to the people in the know (don’t trust the people in the know), the Fed started raising the Fed Funds Rate to late or too early, they will not raise it fast enough or they will raise it too fast, and they will overshoot how high and for how long rates need to stay up and they will either not decrease rates fast enough or too fast on the back side of things. They will not be able to stop the inflation rate from gyrating all over the place, both up and down and they will likely completely miss their target inflation rate of 2.0% by a wide margin. The final solution to the last point will be that the Fed will change the target inflation rate to something other than 2.0%. In two years the Fed will declare that they beat inflation and it is now tame again at whatever rate they decide on. Again, not accurate (notice I didn’t say not true) as the Fed never has really been able to control inflation but rather sets a rate (for the last several years, 2.0%) that somewhat matches the ongoing economic activities. There will be more articles about the Fed and its “fine tuning” the Fed Funds Rate in the coming months. Don’t be fooled by the noise.

                The final article is a bit of fluff about the resignation of Prime Minster Liz Truss (Britain) after just 44 days in office. She has the distinction of being the shortest serving prime minster in history. Many of her problems were caused by very aggressive economic policies that were considered too radical for the times. Just a reminder why governments tend to be slow and ponderous in their decisions and a good example of why we have had 20+ years of expansion in this country. It is too politically difficult to change things and who wants to rock the boat, even if it needs it until there is some kind of popular uprising that is consistent with the political leaders thinking. A good example is the case of Ronald Regan and the then new thinking of supply side economics which was a good thing.

 

Articles referenced;

https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2022/10/24/bofa-economist-i-dont-see-how-we-avoid-a-recession/

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/yellen-says-taking-steps-enhance-treasury-market-funds-resilience-2022-10-24/

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-21/fed-officials-expect-debate-on-rate-peak-and-when-to-slow-hikes

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/markets-are-calling-the-shots-uk-traders-react-to-truss-exit-1.1835289

How to Maintain Your Financial Health in Unhealthy Times

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-26/deutsche-bank-sees-5-6-fed-target-rate-and-deep-u-s-recession

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-03/investors-are-so-bearish-on-stocks-that-the-market-looks-bullish

 https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/yellen-sees-solid-growth-possible-soft-landing-for-u-s-economy-1.1761068#:~:text=(Bloomberg)%20%2D%2D%20Treasury%20Secretary%20Janet,moves%20to%20bring%20down%20inflation

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/u-s-stocks-roar-as-powell-quells-fear-of-jumbo-hikes-1.1760681

https://apnews.com/article/business-stock-markets-asia-sydney-hong-kong-c341786b3e475916247b2fcd5c07602f

                There is a concept in behavioral economics called loss aversion. It refers to the situation that a real or potential loss is perceived either psychologically or emotionally as being more severe than an equivalent or equal gain. We feel more deeply for a loss than a gain or the loss of $100 is far greater than the joy of gaining $100. For greater insight into this concept check out Nassim Talab’s book, Fooled by Randomness. I recommend it for this and many other things. This applied to today’s comments on several levels.

                I have included several articles on the recent happenings in the markets and with various statements by banking and governmental officials which need to be read in order listed to show the progression of thoughts and ideas in the last two weeks. I had a discussion earlier this week with someone who wanted to know what they should be investing in. They didn’t think I had given a very satisfactory answer when I suggested they shouldn’t be doing any investing. I would go so far as to suggest that looking at financial news with the intent of investing should not be done right now. Don’t look or follow or even think about financial news, at least not if you are looking for information to help you choose investments or trying out some strategy suggested by a financial advisor or even well meaning friend. Because the only thing that will happen is you will feel rotten or worse, hopeless. Any investment decision you make right now will result in some loss, possibly a lot of loss and remember, loses contain more negative punch than comparable gains. Granted, your current investments may be taking a hit but then you are not following my initial counsel to avoid looking at financial news with the intent to invest. Think back to the first paragraph about loss aversion. Right now the market is so all over the place any gains (feeling some little good) will be massively offset by losses (feeling much more bad). The articles I have included / listed show how in just a couple of weeks we have gone from despair to euphoria to despair (not quite that extreme but you get the point).

                The first article from Deutsche Bank (April 26, 2022) suggests we will definitely have a recession in 2023 and that the Fed monetary policy needs to be very aggressive, i.e. really jumping the Fed Funds rate up a lot and often. The second article from Bloomberg dated May 3, 2022 suggests investors are too Bearish. “Investors have become so negative about the stock market that Wall Street [read smart money] is starting [to] think a rally may be on the way.” They give several technical metrics to support their thinking. The Third article from BNN Bloomberg (May 4, 2022) states Yellen thinks the Fed can make a “soft landing” for the economy. Again, a couple of reasons are listed. We have a very negative article (recession next year) followed by 2 very positive articles (market likely going up and no recession next year).

                The last two articles show what actually happened. The BNN Bloomberg article is from May 4, 2022 the day of the Fed meeting and the AP article is from May 5, 2022 the day after the Fed meeting. The May 4^th article is after the meeting and gives the reaction of markets during the next few hours. Markets are up 3%, joy and jubilation. Several reasons are given including that Chairman Powell says that .75% Fed Funds Rate increases are off the table. All is roses and smells great (an emotional gain). The next day the markets falls 3% (an emotional loss). How could this happen, the fiscal doves had taken over, the world was roses, champagne had been flowing. The talking heads had spoken. We are told in the AP News article that “yesterday’s sharp rally was not rooted in reality and today’s dramatic selloff is a reversal of that misplaced exuberance”. Exactly what does that mean. So, yesterday pundits couldn’t read the signs but today they can? What about tomorrow’s swings, for there certainly will be swings. Will those signs be read correctly? What will be the greater insight and understanding that will allow for reasoned understanding and the ability to plot the market and world economies, especially on a day to day basis. Now do you see why you should not be reading the financial news thinking about investing. The financial noise is so loud individuals can’t hear, let alone think in any kind of reasonable manner. There is little real information in the noise that would allow for reasoned decisions. The financial pundits will never apologize for, attempt to correct nor take any responsibility for any misconception, error or misleading statements . You will find contradictions among the nuggets of truth and accurate information. It is the nature of financial noise because remember, in the markets, information is power and financial noise may contain useful information and….. may not. How do you tell (it is extremely difficult).  

                What should you be doing at this point or any point in which you need to make financial decisions. Think of the tortoise and the hare or slow and steady. Limit your debt to necessities like education, housing (don’t ever consider variable rate financing – too many potential problems) and transportation. Have a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, mutual funds. Remember, stocks are usually a longer term investment with the expectation that they will go up and down, mainly up over the longer term. Bonds tend to be a bit more stable and many times move opposite stocks (but not always) and mutual funds, to get more diversity from smaller investments. A mix is good. Look at rebalancing your investments on a regular basis, a good financial advisor can help.

                Hang in there. These are unhealthy times for those that immerse themselves in the dirty waters of too much financial noise (news). Watch from the sidelines. Keep to the regular and steady investing schedules you have established before and don’t think you can time or out smart the market.